Introduction

Phytosterols (PS) are plant-derived compounds whose structure is similar to that of cholesterol (CHOL). Consequently, they decrease intestinal absorbtion of CHOL, leading to an improved lipid profile. Main PS are sitosterol, campesterol, and sigmasterol. They are found in vegetable oils and, to a lesser extent, in vegetables, fresh fruits, nuts, grains, and legumes.1 Dietary intake is the only source of PS, since they are not synthesized within human body and do not have any physiological functions.2 Due to the widespread presence of PS in foods and supplements, PS have become an adjunct to the pharmacological treatment of dyslipidemia, especially in very-high-risk patients who fail to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target levels with guideline-recommended therapy or in individuals intolerant to first-line therapies. Several studies also demonstrated anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of PS. However, their long-term efficacy and optimal integration into the guideline-recommended treatment remain unclear.3 There are various recent studies focusing on the mechanisms of action of PS, their potential use in medical practice, as well as the risks and controversies associated with them.4-6

This aim of this review was to summarize latest knowledge on the mechanism of action of PS, their clinical efficacy and current clinical applications, PS safety profile, the gaps in knowledge on PS, and indications for PS use in daily practice.

Mechanism of action

The mechanism of action of PS comprises various elements. They have impact on CHOL absorption, influence CHOL biliary excretion and atherosclerotic plaque formation, and have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.

CHOL and PS are absorbed in the small intestine in the form of micelles. They are transported inside the enterocytes via the Niemann–Pick C1-like intracellular cholesterol transporter 1 (NPC1L1) (Figure 1). However, about 98% of the initial PS and 40%–50% of CHOL are transported back into the intestinal lumen through the action of the ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 5 (ABCG5)/ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 8 (ABCG8) transport system. Eventually, approximately 50%–60% of CHOL and only 0.5%–2% of PS are absorbed into the body (Figure 2).4,5

Figure 1. Phytosterol and cholesterol metabolism

Abbreviations: Apo-A, apolipoprotein A; ABCG5/8, adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette subfamily G member 5 / member 8; CHOL, cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; IDL, intermediate-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; NPC1L1, Niemann–Pick C1-like intracellular cholesterol transporter 1; PS, phytosterols; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein

Figure 2. Influence of phytosterols on cholesterol absorption; A – absorption of cholesterol without phytosterols; B – absorption of cholesterol with phytosterols

Abbreviations: see Figure 1

Prior to their release into the lymphatic system, esterified CHOL and PS are encapsulated into chylomicrons, which are converted into remnants and transported to the liver. A small amount of free CHOL and sterols can be released from enterocytes via high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles.

The liver is a reservoir of CHOL, both endogenously synthesized and derived from dietary sources. Also, the liver produces very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), which contains triglycerides, CHOL, and apolipoprotein (Apo) B100. Subsequently, VLDL is transformed into intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL), and finally into LDL, the principal transporter of CHOL in the bloodstream.4,5 Part of CHOL in the liver is metabolized into bile acids and transported into the bile.

Plant sterols upregulate bile acid synthesis, escalating CHOL transport through the excretory biliary pathway. Also, they downregulate microsomal triglyceride transfer protein, which results in a decreased secretion of VLDL.6

CHOL can deposit in arterial walls, increasing the risk of cardiovascular events. Chylomicron remnants can also play a role in the creation of atherosclerotic plaques in arterial walls, which can lead to the development of cardiovascular diseases.4,5 PS can accumulate in arterial walls; however, their absorption is minimal (2%), and their role in lowering total cholesterol (TC) level contributes to atherosclerosis prevention rather than atherosclerotic plaque formation.4

PS also reduce the levels of free radicals, such as hydroperoxides and hydrogen peroxide.6,7 They activate catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione, which exhibit antioxidant properties.6,8,9 Additionally, PS inhibit lipid peroxidation and suppress proinflammatory cytokines.10-14

PS play a crucial role in modulating CHOL metabolism. They not only lower CHOL absorption due to similar structure, but also influence CHOL biliary excretion and lipoprotein secretion. Moreover, they exhibit antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.

Clinical efficacy

According to the guidelines of leading scientific societies, such as the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerois Society (EAS), statins are the recommended first-line treatment for dyslipidemia, while ezetimibe is considered a second-line option. However, in some patients, especially those who cannot tolerate statins, PS play a role as an adjunct to the pharmacological treatment. The selection of the right dose and the effectiveness of PS in lowering TC, different lipoproteins, and triglycerides levels have been researched in a number of studies.1,4,15-21

Based on the ESC/EAS guidelines, a daily intake of 2 g of PS can reduce LDL-C and TC levels by 7%–10%, while moderate-intensity statin therapy reduces LDL-C by 30%–50%.1 A meta-analysis including 1777 patients treated with PS for 3–85 weeks confirmed the LDL-C–lowering effect of PS (median, –0.38 mmol/l; 95% CI, –0.5 to −0.27). It also showed that PS lowered Apo-B levels (median, 0.04 g/l; 95% CI, –0.06 to −0.02).16 A PS dose both below 2 g and above 2 g can increase HDL-C levels by about 0.04 mmol/l (95% CI, 0.01–0.06) (Figure 3), with 3 g of PS being the most effective dose to decrease TC and LDL-C levels.16,17 The effect of doses greater than 4 g per day remains unclear.

Figure 3. Influence of phytosterols on lipid profile

Abbreviations: IDL-B, intermediate-density lipoprotein B; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; others, see Figure 1

Another prospective study including 23 patients observed for 24 weeks also demonstrated that PS could lower IDL-B levels.18 A meta-analysis of 17 studies and 23 study arms demonstrated its triglyceride-lowering effect. It was reported that consumption of doses lower than or equal to 2 g of PS per day over 8 weeks lowered serum triglycerides by –3.77 mg/dl (95% CI, –6.04 to –1.51).4 Moreover, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial including 202 patients with metabolic syndrome showed a 15%–17% reduction in triglyceride levels in individuals taking 2 g of free-PS nanoparticles for 6 months, when compared with a placebo.19 Rideout et al20 reported that hypertriglyceridemic individuals (>1.7 mmol/l) exhibited a greater triglyceride-lowering response to PS (11%–28%) than individuals with normal plasma triglyceride concentrations (0.8%–7%).

Interestingly, a randomized controlled trial including 41 patients showed that beside the dose, the efficacy of CHOL-lowering properties of PS depended on the administration route.21 PS added to fat-based food caused a reduction of the LDL-C level, as opposed to PS delivered in the form of softgel capsules.

Generally, PS demonstrate a TC-lowering effect. Their role in decreasing triglycerides and different lipoprotein levels has also been demonstrated. However, the optimal dosage in different populations and the long-term effect on lipid fractions remain unclear.

Current clinical applications

PS play a role in clinical practice due to their properties. They are natural, easily accessible, and effective in lowering TC and LDL-C levels, especially in patients who cannot take statins and fail to achieve LDL-C target levels or individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia.

PS are naturally present in plant-based foods, such as margarine, bread, cereal, fruits, and vegetables.22 There are also foods enriched in PS, for instance, fresh dairy products, condiment sauces, soy, fruit drinks, and sausages. Another source of PS are standalone dietary supplements. They are most effective when used alongside lifestyle modifications, such as a healthy diet.1,16,18 The intake of products enriched with PS in amounts ranging from 1.5 to 2.4 g per day has been shown to reduce TC and LDL-C levels by approximately 10% over a period of a few weeks to 1 or 2 years.23 Table 1 presents examples of doses, methods, and duration of PS administration in the conducted studies.

Table 1. Dosing and administration of phytosterols

Trial

Dosage

Food product

Duration

Ruiu et al58

1 g/d

Fermented pasteurized milk

4 weeks

Amir Shaghaghi et al59

2 g/d

Yogurt

4 weeks

Castro Cabezas et al60

3 g/d

Margarine

6 weeks

Sialvera et al61

4 g/d

Yogurt

2 months

According to the ESC/EAS and the Polish Lipid Society guidelines, PS dose higher than 2 g per day taken with the main meal may be considered in the following situations: 1) in patients with high CHOL levels at an intermediate or low global cardiovascular risk who do not yet qualify for pharmacotherapy; 2) as a supplement to pharmacological therapy in high-and very-high-risk patients who fail to reach their target LDL-C levels with statins or cannot be treated with statins; and 3) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (aged >6 years).1,15 Statin therapy can be associated with adverse effects, such as myopathy, myalgia, rhabdomyolysis, hepatotoxicity, and diabetes mellitus, occurring more likely in elderly patients. This prompts both physicians and patients to search for alternative therapies.24,25 Moreover, PS use in high-risk populations, such as individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia, highlights their potential as a complementary therapy.26,27

In conclusion, PS present in natural products or obtained via supplementation may be particularly useful in individuals who do not tolerate statins or require additional lipid-lowering strategies. Their integration into a healthy diet combined with lifestyle modifications represents a useful method in the management of hypercholesterolemia.

Safety profile

PS are commonly referred to as safe and well-tolerated dietary supplements. Their adverse effects are generally mild and include nausea, diarrhea, constipation, and indigestion.28 However, the risk of adverse effects may be higher in patients with phytosterolemia. Moreover, PS can impair β-carotene and vitamin D absorption.

Phytosterolemia, also known as sitosterolemia, is a rare metabolic disorder inherited in an autosomal-recessive manner, usually manifesting in early childhood. Worldwide, only around 100 cases have been reported in literature. Phytosterolemia is caused by mutations in the genes responsible for encoding the ABCG5/8 cotransporter, which is responsible for pumping sterols back into the small intestine lumen and their transport from hepatocytes into the bile ducts. This leads to intestinal hyperabsorption and reduced biliary excretion of dietary sterols. Furthermore, individuals with phytosterolemia exhibit elevated CHOL biosynthesis due to the increased 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity, which can result in hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis. While concentrations of PS in healthy individuals vary between 0.5 and 2 mg/dl, patients with phytosterolemia can reach concentrations of up to 3 mg/dl in heterozygotes and up to 65 mg/dl in homozygotes.29,30 Some studies reported that those patients can exhibit increased cardiovascular risk; however, it is still debatable whether this is due to increased PS levels or increased LDL-C levels.29

Elevated PS levels have been shown to promote atherosclerosis in some animal models.29,31 Nevertheless, human studies have not consistently supported these findings.29 There is no apparent evidence that the elevation in plasma PS concentrations of up to 15 mg/dl, induced by the consumption of PS-enriched foods, might cause atherogenic effects that could surpass the 20–40 times greater reduction in LDL-C levels. However, another study reported that in 30% of the participants, consumption of PS-enriched foods did not cause a drop in LDL-C levels, which may indicate the influence of genetic factors on PS activity.3 In homozygous familial phytosterolemia, atherosclerosis seems to be caused by excessively high plasma LDL-C levels (770 mg/dl) starting in childhood, and not by high PS levels.

Several experiments demonstrated an impaired absorption of β-carotene and vitamin D in the presence of PS.30,32 However, PS did not affect the absorption of vitamins A and K.30

Hence, while PS present potential benefits, their effect depends on other factors, such as genetics and dosage. Their safety, especially in patients with disorders such as phytosterolemia, is not fully understood.

Future perspectives in clinical practice

Research on PS is constantly developing and the possibilities for their use in clinical practice are expanding. Advancements in food technology and chemical and physical modifications of PS aim to enhance their limited bioavailability and susceptibility to degradation.33-38 Moreover, potential anticancer properties of PS have been reported in recent studies.39-43

The bioavailability of PS within dietary matrices is limited, as they are susceptible to oxidative degradation and exhibit diminished solubility in aqueous environments. Nonetheless, many technological strategies have been formulated to improve PS incorporation into food products, which could guarantee sufficient quantities to effectively lower CHOL levels.33 The variety of molecular structures of PS can have an impact on their bioavailability and physicochemical features. These structures can be free sterols, sterol esters, steryl glycosides, and acylated glycosides.34,35 Previous studies indicated that PS bioavailability can be increased through both chemical and physical modifications.36,37 Chemical modifications focused on esterification to increase oil and water solubility, while physical modifications involved microenocapsulation. Development of a nanoscale delivery system can contribute to the improvement in absorption and reduced loss of biologically active substances.36 Currently, research is focusing on the influence of the food matrix on nanodelivery systems and the impact of food processing on PS bioavailability. Also, researchers aim to find the way to produce the most stable nanocapsules to deliver PS.38 Oxidates which can be produced during PS ester synthesis have shown toxicity in several studies. The toxicity of nanocarriers remains unclear.36

Recent studies have reported the potential anticancer effects of PS. They may decrease the risk of breast,39 ovary,40 lung, liver,41 stomach,42 esophageal,43 and colorectal cancer development.44 PS protective mechanisms of action against cancer are not clear, but several potential pathways have been proposed. These include suppressing carcinogen production, hindering the growth and proliferation of cancer cells, preventing invasion and metastasis, and triggering cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Additional mechanisms suggested in animal models involve reducing angiogenesis, limiting cancer cell adhesion and invasion, and decreasing the production of reactive oxygen species.41,45

The existing research indicates the growing role of PS in clinical practice (Tables 2 and 3). Their potential anticancer effects and innovative technologies to enhance their bioavailability are being intensively studied. However, further research, especially human studies, is required to fully assess their efficacy and safety.

Table 2. Effects of phytosterols on different health conditions

Parameter

Effect of phytosterols

Reference

Lipid-lowering properties

  • Reduction of LDL-C, TC, Apo-B, IDL-B, and triglycerides levels

1,4,16,17,18,19

Cardiovascular risk

  • Lowering the risk of atherosclerotic plaque formation in arterial walls by reducing LDL-C and TC levels
  • Possible increased risk of PS adverse effects in patients with phytosterolemia
  • Increased cardiovascular risk in individuals with phytosterolemia (debated)

4,5,29,30,31

Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties

  • Decreasing proinflammatory cytokines
  • Reduction of oxidative stress
  • Inhibition of lipid peroxidation

6,9,10,11,12,13,14

Cancer prevention

  • Possible anticancer properties (eg, breast, colorectal, liver, stomach, and esophageal cancer)

39,40,41,42,43

Impact on gut microbiome

  • Modification of microbiome composition
  • Increasing short-chain fatty acids production
  • Impact on expression of genes related to cholesterol metabolism

48,49,50,51,52

Abbreviations: TC, total cholesterol; others, see Figure 1

Table 3. Advantages and disadvantages of phytosterols

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Reduction of intestinal cholesterol absorption due to similar structure1
  • Reduction of the levels of free radicals, such as hydroperoxides and hydrogen peroxide6,7
  • Antioxidant properties6,9
  • Lowering TC and triglyceride levels4,16,17,19
  • Lowering LDL-C, IDL-B, and Apo-B levels16,17,18
  • Increasing HDL-C level16,17
  • Useful in individuals who do not tolerate statins or require additional lipid-lowering strategies1
  • Found in natural products1
  • Increased risk of adverse effects in patients with phytosterolemia29,30
  • Potential impaired absorption of β-carotene and vitamin D30,32
  • Limited bioavailability within dietary matrices due to susceptibility to oxidative degradation and diminished solubility in aqueous environments33
  • Unclear long-term efficacy and optimal integration into the guideline-recommended treatment16

Abbreviations: HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; others see Figures 1 and 3

Gaps in knowledge and research directions

Current research underlines several gaps in knowledge concerning PS long-term safety and the effect of gut microbiome and genetics on their efficacy. PS interactions with other CHOL-lowering drugs are not fully understood either.

Only a few studies analyzed PS treatment lasting over 3 months. Hence, PS long-term efficacy and safety remain unclear.16 The impact of possible increase in plasma PS levels on cardiovascular risk is also unknown.3,24 There is no evidence indicating that the consumption of plant sterols and stanols affects markers of atherosclerosis, such as carotid intima-media thickness and flow-mediated dilation.24,46

Recent studies have indicated the influence of genetics and the gut microbiome on CHOL absorption.4,47,48 Thus, these factors may also affect the effectiveness of PS and the selection of personalized treatment.

Loss-of-function (LoF) variants in genes encoding intestinal transporters, such as NPC1L1 and ABCG5/G8 transporters, have demonstrated associations between CHOL metabolism and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Specifically, LoF variants in NPC1L1 lead to decreased CHOL absorption, while those in ABCG5 and ABCG8 result in increased CHOL absorption.4,47

There is a growing number of studies highlighting the bidirectional interaction between PS and the gut microbiome. The gut microbiota can influence CHOL metabolism. It can ferment dietary fiber to produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which can inhibit CHOL synthesis.48,49 It can convert CHOL to coprostanol, which is characterized by a very low absorption rate.48,50 Also, it can affect the expression of some genes related to CHOL metabolism.48,51 Diets supplemented with PS have been shown to enhance the abundance of beneficial microbiota species, such as Eubacterium halii, while simultaneously reducing the prevalence of the Erysipelotrichaceae family within the Firmicutes phylum. This bacterial family is suggested to contribute to the development of metabolic disorders.52 Plant sterols in the microbiota from a lean population alter the CHOL biotransformation pathway, reducing the generation of CHOL metabolites while enhancing the metabolism of plant sterols. CHOL metabolites coprostanol and coprostanone are considered colon carcinogens.52,53 The concentration of these metabolites is higher in fermentation in obese vs lean population.53 Moreover, PS contribute to an increase in SCFAs, which may reduce appetite and lower food supply, and help prevent colon cancer.53 However, further investigation is needed to better understand anticancer and hepatoprotective properties of PS.30

Interactions between PS and other CHOL-lowering drugs have also been studied. It has been indicated that the combined action of these compounds reduces CHOL concentration in plasma. A meta-analysis that included 15 randomized clinical trials showed that PS combined with statin treatment, compared with statins alone, decreased the levels of TC and LDL-C by 0.3 mmol/l.54 Interestingly, the study showed that statins and ezetimibe also influenced the reduction of PS concentration in plasma, which could be beneficial in patients with phytosterolemia. The study demonstrated that ezetimibe monotherapy significantly reduced plasma sitosterol and campesterol concentrations, while statins significantly decreased desmosterol and lathosterol levels.55 Ezetimibe and statins administered together lowered all the above-mentioned sterol levels. However, long-term interactions between these substances require further research.55-57

Filling the gaps in the presented areas can be useful in determining full therapeutic potential of PS and assessing interactions between factors such as genetics, gut microbiota, and drugs, which can be valuable in clinical practice.

Conclusions

PS have gained interest in the management of dyslipidemia and other health conditions due to their cholesterol-lowering, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties. They are being increasingly integrated into lifestyle changes as an adjunct to the statin and ezetimibe treatments aimed at decreasing LDL-C, TC, IDL-B, and Apo-B levels, which is especially beneficial for very-high-risk patients who fail to achieve target LDL-C levels or do not tolerate statins. Genetics and the gut microbiome may affect the efficacy of PS treatment. Due to limited bioavailability of PS within dietary matrices, recent advancements, such as esterification and nanoscale delivery systems, have been studied. However, further research is needed to determine appropriate PS delivery methods, their long-term safety, and interactions with other CHOL-lowering drugs. With individual selection of treatment, PS can become an important factor in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, metabolic syndrome, and potentially cancer.