Introduction
According to the latest data, the obesity epidemic continues to grow. Over the past 50 years, the number of individuals with obesity has tripled.1 Consequently, the prevalence of obesity-related conditions, including cardiovascular diseases, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cancer, and type 2 diabetes (T2D), is also on the rise.2 Currently, more than 60% of Europeans are classified as overweight or obese. In Poland, the obesity rate among adults exceeds 25%. These statistics emphasize the need to explore increasingly effective treatment approaches.1-4 Data show that among the operations accepted by the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is one of the most effective in terms of weight loss in both early and long-term follow-up.5-7 It can also be performed as a revisional procedure after sleeve gastrectomy (SG), in which case it involves duodenal transection with single-anastomosis-duodeno ileal bypass creation (SADI). In Poland, SG is still the option of choice in multiple bariatric centers.8,9 The available global data indicate that within 15 years of primary SG, up to 50% of patients in certain cohorts may necessitate surgical conversion due to gastroesophageal reflux, resurgence of obesity, or comorbidities. This substantial conversion rate underscores the importance of developing more effective primary surgical approaches and provision of effective second-stage surgeries for patients.10-12 Currently, primary SADI-S is performed in a small group of bariatric patients. This study summarizes early experiences with and results of SADI-S. To our best knowledge, this is the first Polish publication describing primary SADI-S.13
Aim
This study aims to present the results of the first group of patients treated with SADI-S or SADI in Poland.
Materials and methods
This retrospective, single-center cohort study analyzed outcomes of patients who underwent SADI-S or SADI for obesity between February 2023 and March 2024. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. The patients were qualified for surgery according to national and international criteria.14 For the purposes of this publication, the abbreviation SADI was used to refer to the surgical conversion of SG to SADI-S.
Postoperative evaluation was performed during in-person follow-up visits 6 and 12 months after the surgery. It included assessment of body mass index (BMI) and weight loss reported as a percentage of total weight loss (%TWL). The patients were also asked about the presence / remission of T2D and hypertension. All outcomes were reported according the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) standards.15 Remission of T2D was defined as normal values of glucose metabolism indices (glycated hemoglobin A1c <6%, fasting blood glucose <100 mg/dl) in the absence of antidiabetic medications. Remission of hypertension was defined as being normotensive (blood pressure <120/80 mm Hg) without antihypertensive medications. We also analyzed the length of hospital stay, operative time, and complications throughout the follow-up. The patients who did not attend subsequent follow-up visits or did not agree to participate in the study were considered lost to follow-up and were not included in the analysis.
Surgical technique
All patients underwent SADI-S or SADI according to the standard technique.5,16 All surgeries were conducted laparoscopically in the beach chair position. The pneumoperitoneum was established using a 12-mm optical trocar placed supraumbilically. Additionally, a 12-mm port was inserted in the right and left mid-abdomen, and three 5-mm ports were inserted, one in the middle epigastrium, one in the left subcostal area, and one in the middle hypogastrium. In the initial stage of the operation, a high-energy device was utilized to skeletonize the greater curvature of the stomach, dissect the antrum approximately 3 cm from the duodenum, and cut the right gastroepiploic vessels. At the end of this stage, a retroduodenal tunnel was created. SG was performed using staplers tailored to the tissue thickness. The resection was carried out approximately 5 cm from the pylorus and 1 cm from the angle of His. The duodenum was cut using a stapler, and particular care was taken not to damage the pylorus, gallbladder, or the structures of the liver hilum. The staple line on the stomach and duodenum walls was not reinforced with sutures or clips. During the first 4 procedures, the right gastric artery remained intact, but for the subsequent surgeries, the strategy was modified and the artery was cut. Subsequently, 275 cm of the ileal loop were measured from the ileocecal valve, and a manual duodenojejunal anastomosis was performed using barbed sutures. After the anastomosis was completed, a bougie was passed through it, and a leak test was performed using methylene blue. Trocars and pneumoperitoneum were removed under visual control, with particular attention paid to bleeding. No additional sutures were used to close the fascia.
The perioperative care was guided by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol, and no drains were used. Mobilization was attempted within 2 hours of the surgery. An oral liquid diet was followed on the day of the surgery. The patients were discharged on the first postoperative day. Mechanical compression of the lower limbs was used during the procedure. Pharmacologic antithrombotic prophylaxis with a 40-mg dose of enoxaparin once daily was administered during hospitalization and continued for 10 days after discharge. The patients were recommended to use esomeprazole 40 mg once a day for 3 months and ursodeoxycholic acid 600 mg once daily for 6 months. Indocyanine green and a camera with infrared detection were used to confirm proper blood supply to the duodenal stump. Normal blood flow was confirmed in all patients, regardless of whether the gastric artery was cut or left intact.
Statistical analysis
The Statistica software (Statistica Inc., Kraków, Poland) was employed for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were used. The mean (SD) values were estimated for continuous data, whereas categorical data were presented as numbers and percentages.
Ethics
The data were completely anonymized. The study followed international regulations on observational studies as well as the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki on ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, including research on identifiable human material and data. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study protocol was approved by a bioethics committee (KB-32/24).
Results
A total of 12 patients were analyzed. Of those, 9 underwent primary SADI-S and 3 underwent revisional SADI. One patient (8.3%) was lost to follow-up. The patients were followed for a mean (SD) of 10.1 (3.4) months.
Primary single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy
The mean (SD) age of patients undergoing primary SADI-S was 41.2 (9.2) years. The mean (SD) preoperative BMI was 42 (5.6) kg/m2, the mean (SD) length of hospital stay was 2.1 (0.3) days, and the mean (SD) operative time was 115 (34.2) minutes (Table 1). After the surgery, the mean (SD) %TWL was 27.9% (4.3%) at 6 months and 31.1% (5.9%) at 12 months (Table 2, Figure 1). At the baseline, a total of 5 patients suffered from T2D and 3 patients had hypertension. Remission of these comorbidities was achieved in all patients within 6 months of the procedure (Table 2).

Parameter | Primary SADI-S (n = 9) | Revisional SADI (n = 3) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sex, n (%) | Men | 2 (22.2) | 1 (33.3) |
Women | 7 (77.8) | 2 (66.7) | |
Age, y, mean (SD) | 41.4 (9.2) | 37.3 (6.5) | |
Preoperative BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD) | 42 (5.5) | 42.4 (9.3) | |
Length of hospital stay, d, mean (SD) | 2.1 (0.3) | 2 (0) | |
Operative time, min, mean (SD) | 115 (34.2) | 93 (4.7) | |
T2D, n (%) | 7 (77.8) | 2 (66.7) | |
Hypertension, n (%) | 2 (22.2) | 0 | |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SADI, single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass; SADI-S, single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy; T2D, type 2 diabetes | |||

Parameter | Primary SADI-S | Revisional SADI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
After 6 months (n = 9) | After 12 months (n = 3) | After 6 months (n = 3) | After 12 months (n = 2) | |
BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD) | 30.2 (4.8) | 29.8 (2.7) | 32 (0.4) | 30.7 (0) |
%TWL, mean (SD) | 27.9 (4.3) | 31.1 (5.9) | 21.2 (15.2) | 14.0 (7.5) |
T2D remission, n (%) | 5 (100) | – | 2 (100) | – |
Hypertension remission, n (%) | 3 (100) | – | – | – |
Abbreviations: %TWL, percentage of total weight loss; others, see Table 1 | ||||

Figure 1. Trends in body mass index loss after primary and revisional surgery
Abbreviations, see Table 1
Revisional single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass
The revisional surgeries were performed due to weight regain after primary SG in 1 patient and occurrence of T2D despite primary SG in 2 patients. The mean (SD) patient age was 37.3 (6.5) years. The mean (SD) preoperative BMI was 42.4 (9.3) kg/m2, the mean length of hospital stay was 2 days, and the mean operative time was 93.3 (4.7) minutes. The mean (SD) %TWL was 21.2% (15.2%) and 14% (7.5%), respectively, at postoperative months 6 and 12 (Table 2, Figure 1). Two patients had T2D at baseline, both of whom achieved remission 6 months after the surgery (Table 2).
Complications
There were no prolonged hospital stays or deaths in the study group. No complications occurred during the follow-up in any of the patients.
The surgery was performed in 12 of 13 qualified patients. One patient (7.9%) required intraoperative conversion to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). During the duodeno-ileal anastomosis creation, the duodenal stump tore along in the suture line. The defect was detected during the methylene blue test. The procedure was immediately converted to OAGB, as suturing of the perforation was technically impossible. The antrum was resected and a long pouch was created, as in the standard OAGB procedure. Subsequently, 150 cm of the small intestine were measured from the ligament of Treitz. A 2.5-cm-long mechanical anastomosis was made on the posterior wall of the pouch. The gastroenterotomy was closed with 2 layers of barbed continuous suture. The methylene blue test was negative. The hospital stay lasted 3 days, and the postoperative course was uncomplicated. The patient was not included in the analysis.
Discussion
Our study shows that even in a short postoperative observation, SADI-S or SADI is associated with good weight loss results and complete resolution of comorbidities. Cutting the right gastric artery does not increase the risk of duodenal ischemia, as confirmed by an indocyanine green test. SADI-S is an advanced surgical procedure and should be performed by highly skilled bariatric and metabolic surgeons. Even major complications, such as duodenal rupture during anastomosis creation, can be effectively managed by an experienced team.
SADI-S was first described by Sánchez-Pernaute et al5,17 as a simplified version of biliopancreatic diversion with reduced operative time and fewer surgery stages.
Weight loss
Available data show excellent weight loss results after both primary SADI-S and revisional SADI in the short- and long-term observation. Sánchez-Pernaute et al5 reported an excess weight loss of 94.7% in early follow-up. In subsequent publications, the authors confirmed the above conclusions in a medium and long-term observation.6,18,19 In a study involving 91 patients undergoing SADI-S, Surve et al20 concluded that the mean (SD) %TWL was 34.6% (9.2%) at 1-year and 38.8% (9.9%) at 2-year follow-up. Also, Enochs et al21 described a %TWL of 36.8% in the second year of follow-up, which was greater than the BMI loss after Roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB) and laparoscopic SG. Similar results have been obtained by other authors.22,23
The positive effects of SADI-S on weight loss have also been demonstrated in revisional surgery. The reported %TWL 12 months after SADI ranged from 18.65% to 22%.13,24 Wu et al25 noted a %TWL of 22.34% at the 1-year follow-up; a common limb length of 200 cm was used in this study. Our results are consistent with these literature reports, even though they pertain to outcomes from the learning curve.
Type 2 diabetes
The available literature describes reasonable glycemic control combined with complete resolution of T2D in up to 94% of patients undergoing SADI-S, even in a short postoperative follow-up.6,18,20,21,26-28 Revisional SADI appears to be similarly effective in treating diabetes, with a remission rate of up to 94%.13,24,25 Moreover, Wang et al28 reported complete resolution of diabetes in 87% of patients with BMI below 35 kg/m2 who were initially scheduled for surgery to treat diabetes as the primary goal.
Hypertension
Remission of hypertension after primary SADI-S occurs in 42.4% to 94% of patients.20,29,30 For revisional surgery, the reported remission rate is lower and ranges from 27.8% to 49.2%.31,32
Major complications
The risk of early major complications after primary SADI-S and revisional SADI is not high and amounts to 6.1%, while the reoperation rate is 3.1%. The most common complications include bleeding (1.1%), wound infection (1%), anastomotic leak (0.9%), and intra-abdominal abscess (0.6%). Duodenal stump and sleeve leakage rates are 0.3% and 0.4%, respectively. Deep vein thrombosis occurs in 0.4% of cases. Death is one of the rarest complications, occurring in 0.1% of cases.18,22,25,29-31,33-37 Although the risk of complications exceeds 6%, SADI-S should be classified as a low-risk surgery, as the rate of early complications is lower than that observed after more established procedures, such as SG and RYGB.38
Limitations
The main limitation of this study is the small sample size and short follow-up period. With only 3 patients in the revisional group, it was not possible to draw definitive conclusions or make meaningful comparisons between primary and revisional procedures in terms of their effectiveness. Additionally, due to the limited number of patients, generalizability of the results is restricted. Despite these limitations, this study remains one of the first reports from Poland on the outcomes of SADI and SADI-S procedures. As such, it is valuable in the context of demonstrating the initial results of these surgeries in the Polish population.
Conclusions
Patients treated with SADI-S and SADI can achieve significant weight loss and high rates of T2D and hypertension remission in the early postoperative period. No complications were observed during follow-up, supporting the short-term safety of these procedures. In the case of technical difficulties, conversion to another method can be performed effectively by an experienced team. While the small sample size limits the strength of the conclusions, these findings are promising.
Mateusz Wityk, MD, Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Regional Health Centre, ul. Bema 5, 59-300 Lubin, Poland, phone: +48 76 840 15 00, email: mateuszwityk@gmail.com
October 10, 2024.
November 12, 2024.
November 19, 2024.
None.
None.
MW conceived the concept of the study. MW, ND, and MB contributed to the research design. All authors were involved in data collection. MW, MP, and MB analyzed the data. MW and ND coordinated and supervised the project. All authors edited and approved the final version of the manuscript.
No AI has been used during the preparation of this manuscript.
None declared.
Wityk M, Bobowicz M, Pryt M, Dowgiałło-Gornowicz N. Early results of laparoscopic single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: a case series from a single Polish bariatric center. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024; 19: 460-464. doi:10.20452/wiitm.2024.17912
- 1.
- Boutari C, Mantzoros CS. A 2022 update on the epidemiology of obesity and a call to action: as its twin COVID-19 pandemic appears to be receding, the obesity and dysmetabolism pandemic continues to rage on. Metabolism. 2022; 133: 155 217.Crossref
- 2.
- Wysocki M, Mizera M, Karpińska I et al. Analysis of quality of life in patients with clinically severe obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy - a 12-month prospective observational study. Pol Przegl Chir. 2024; 96: 18-27.Crossref
- 3.
- Rulkiewicz A, Pilchowska I, Lisik W, et al. Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among professionally active adult population in poland and its strong relationship with Cardiovascular Co-Morbidities-POL-O-CARIA 2016-2020 Study. J Clin Med. 2022; 11: 3720.Crossref
- 4.
- Lister NB, Baur LA, Felix JF, et al. Child and adolescent obesity. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2023; 9: 24.Crossref
- 5.
- Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre ME, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). One to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2010; 20: 1720-1726.Crossref
- 6.
- Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera MÁR, Ferré NP, et al. Long-term results of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Obes Surg. 2022; 32: 682-689.Crossref
- 7.
- Brown WA, de Leon Ballesteros GP, Ooi G, et al.; IFSO appointed task force reviewing the literature on SADI-S/OADS. Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy / one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO position statement-update 2020. Obes Surg. 2021; 31: 3-25.Crossref
- 8.
- Walędziak M, Różańska-Walędziak AM, Kowalewski PK, et al. Present trends in bariatric surgery in Poland. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2019; 14: 86-89.Crossref
- 9.
- Stefura T, Mulek R, Krefft M, et al. Comparison of revisional surgeries after OAGB versus RYGB: results from the multicenter Polish Revision Obesity Surgery Study (PROSS). Pol Przegl Chir. 2024; 96: 63-68.Crossref
- 10.
- Avidan R, Abu-Abeid A, Keidar A, et al. Ten-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospectively designed study of a single tertiary center. Obes Surg. 2023; 33: 173-178.Crossref
- 11.
- Felsenreich DM, Artemiou E, Steinlechner K, et al. Fifteen years after sleeve gastrectomy: weight loss, remission of associated medical problems, quality of life, and conversions to roux-en-y gastric bypass-long-term follow-up in a multicenter study. Obes Surg. 2021; 31: 3453-3461.Crossref
- 12.
- Clapp B, Wynn M, Martyn C, et al. Long term (7 or more years) outcomes of the sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018; 14: 741-747.Crossref
- 13.
- Wysocki M, Borys M, Budzyńska D, et al. Initial experience with laparoscopic revisional single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI-S) after failed sleeve gastrectomy. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023; 18: 298-304.Crossref
- 14.
- Szeliga J, Wyleżoł M, Major P, et al; Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Chapter of the Association of Polish Surgeons. Bariatric and metabolic surgery care standards. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020; 15: 391-394. doi:10.5114/wiitm.2020.97935.Crossref
- 15.
- Brethauer SA, Kim J, el Chaar M, et al; ASMBS Clinical Issues Committee. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015; 11: 489-506.Crossref
- 16.
- Eichelter J, Felsenreich DM, Bichler C, et al. Surgical technique of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Surg Technol Int. 2022; 41: sti41/1571.
- 17.
- Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre E, et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007; 17: 1614-1618.Crossref
- 18.
- Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Cabrerizo L, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015; 11: 1092-1098.Crossref
- 19.
- Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Pérez Aguirre E, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013; 9: 731-735.Crossref
- 20.
- Surve A, Rao R, Cottam D, et al. Early outcomes of primary SADI-S: an Australian experience. Obes Surg. 2020; 30: 1429-1436.Crossref
- 21.
- Enochs P, Bull J, Surve A, et al. Comparative analysis of the single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) to established bariatric procedures: an assessment of 2-year postoperative data illustrating weight loss, type 2 diabetes, and nutritional status in a single US center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020; 16: 24-33.Crossref
- 22.
- Gebellí JP, Lazzara C, de Gordejuela AGR, et al. Duodenal switch vs. single-anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S) for the treatment of grade IV obesity: 5-year outcomes of a multicenter prospective cohort comparative study. Obes Surg. 2022; 32: 3839-3846.Crossref
- 23.
- Pennestrì F, Sessa L, Prioli F, et al. Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S): experience from a high-bariatric volume center. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022; 407: 1851-1862.Crossref
- 24.
- Zaveri H, Surve A, Cottam D, et al. A multi-institutional study on the mid-term outcomes of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass as a surgical revision option after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2019; 29: 3165-3173.Crossref
- 25.
- Wu A, Tian J, Cao L, et al. Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) as a revisional surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018; 14: 1686-1690.Crossref
- 26.
- Andalib A, Bouchard P, Alamri H, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S): short-term outcomes from a prospective cohort study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021; 17: 414-424.Crossref
- 27.
- Surve A, Cottam D, Medlin W, et al. Long-term outcomes of primary single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020; 16: 1638-1646.Crossref
- 28.
- Wang L, Wuyun Q, Du D, et al. Primary SADI-S in Chinese with diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m2: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2021; 31: 3116-3122.Crossref
- 29.
- Zaveri H, Surve A, Cottam D, et al. Mid-term 4-year outcomes with single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy surgery at a single US center. Obes Surg. 2018; 28: 3062-3072.Crossref
- 30.
- Moon RC, Gaskins L, Teixeira AF, et al. Safety and effectiveness of single-anastomosis duodenal switch procedure: 2-year result from a single US institution. Obes Surg. 2018; 28: 1571-1577.Crossref
- 31.
- Balibrea JM, Vilallonga R, Hidalgo M, et al. Mid-term results and responsiveness predictors after two-step single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017; 27: 1302-1308.Crossref
- 32.
- Ceha CMM, van Wezenbeek MR, Versteegden DPA, et al. Matched short-term results of SADI versus GBP after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2018; 28: 3809-3814.Crossref
- 33.
- Spinos D, Skarentzos K, Esagian SM, etal. The effectiveness of single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy / one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS): an updated systematic review. Obes Surg. 2021; 31: 1790-1800.Crossref
- 34.
- Dijkhorst PJ, Boerboom AB, Janssen IMC, et al. Failed sleeve gastrectomy: single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass? A multicenter cohort study. Obes Surg. 2018; 28: 3834-3842.Crossref
- 35.
- Pearlstein S, Sabrudin SA, Shayesteh A, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic conversion of failed adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or Single anastomosis duodenal switch (SADS). Obes Surg. 2019; 29: 1726-1733.Crossref
- 36.
- Pereira SS, Guimarães M, Almeida R, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) and single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) result in distinct post-prandial hormone profiles. Int J Obes (Lond). 2019; 43: 2518-2527.Crossref
- 37.
- Sessa L, Guidone C, Gallucci P, et al. Effect of single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy on glucose tolerance test: comparison with other bariatric procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019; 15: 1091-1097.Crossref
- 38.
- Kim JC, Kim MG, Park JK, et al. Outcomes and adverse events after bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2013-2023. J Metab Bariatr Surg. 2023; 12: 76-88.Crossref