Introduction
Indocyanine green (ICG) utilization in surgery increases annually with a broad adoption of new applications. In addition to visualization of the tissues and anastomosis blood supply, it is also used to detect lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels, primary tumors, and metastases. It is instrumental in trauma surgery, microsurgery, and burns treatment.1-10 ICG is a water-soluble, anionic dye compatible with plasma proteins found in the bloodstream. Half-life of the dye is short and ranges from 150 to 180 seconds, depending on the efficiency of liver function. In the liver, ICG is absorbed from the bloodstream in less than 20 minutes after intravenous injection and excreted into bile without undergoing metabolic changes.11-13
ICG was first introduced in clinical practice at the Mayo Clinic in 1955, and gained significant attention for its diagnostic potential. Four years later, it received approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration for various medical applications. Its ability to highlight vascular structures and tissues using near-infrared fluorescence has made it an invaluable tool.8,14
Despite nearly 70 years of using ICG in medicine, there is still a need for more prospective, large-population randomized studies in metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). This prospective study aimed to evaluate the safety of using ICG in MBS, which may contribute to its increased use in this field.
Aim
The primary objective of this study was to examine the incidence of allergic reactions induced by ICG. The secondary aim was to evaluate mortality and morbidity rates during the early postoperative period.
Materials and methods
Patients
This prospective observational cohort study was conducted in patients who underwent MBS from July 2022 to December 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised age over 18 years and meeting the qualification criteria for any MBS procedure.15 Exclusion criteria were: age below 18 years, inability to express informed consent, lack of consent to participate in the study, and other than MBS surgical procedure. Of 318 eligible patients, 171 agreed to participate in the study.
All patients were managed according to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guidelines.16 Each patient was given a carbohydrate-rich drink 2 hours before surgery to help maintain energy levels and minimize the risk of fasting-related complications. Pharmacological and mechanical deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis was applied. Standard of care did not involve placement of a peritoneal drain or urinary catheter. Routine postoperative laboratory blood tests were not conducted. Each patient was qualified for early physical rehabilitation within the first hour following surgery, and an oral liquid diet was introduced. The discharge protocol contained effective pain management, oral diet tolerance, proper mobilization and normal-range heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation levels.
All patients were carefully observed during hospitalization. Surgical evaluation was performed during outpatient visits 10 days and 6 months after surgery. Data on weight loss, possible allergic symptoms, medications taken, and postoperative complications were collected during follow-up. Additionally, the patients were enrolled in the hospital-at-home discharge program with close monitoring by a bariatric nurse every 3 months, and 24/7 over-the-phone teleconsultations in the event of disturbing symptoms. The complications were assessed according to the Clavien–Dindo classification.17
Surgical technique
The same surgical team performed all procedures with standardized patient placement in the beach-chair position, 12 mm Hg pneumoperitoneum, and the same surgical tools. A 34 French bougie was utilized to measure the sleeve and gastric pouch during one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). There was no additional reinforcement of the staple line. We used 150 cm of biliopancreatic limb for OAGB and RYGB. The standard alimentary limb length for RYGB was 75 cm. In the case of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S), the length of the common limb was 275 cm. Anastomoses in the case of OAGB and RYGB were performed using a stapler, with the closure of the common channel using 2 layers of barbed suture. The duodeno-ileal anastomosis was hand-sewn in single anastomosis. In all OAGB and RYGB cases, the mesenteric gap and Petersen space were closed with nonabsorbable sutures. A methylene blue leak test was performed in all procedures following the local MBS safety protocol.
Indocyanine green administration
ICG was used during surgery as an adjunct procedure to detect any ischemic foci. Special attention was paid to the parts of the digestive tract undergoing surgery, that is, the gastric sleeve and the gastrointestinal, entero-intestinal, and duodeno-intestinal anastomoses. The fluorescence assessment protocol was based on literature research findings and our previous experience with ICG use. Following the initial procedural steps, 1 mg of ICG was diluted in 1 ml of sterile water, and administered intravenously via a catheter inserted in the left antecubital fossa. Then, 10 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride solution was administered through the same venous port. The 30-degree infrared 1588 AIM + SPY Fluorescence Technology camera (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States) was then activated to enable real-time blood flow screening. The fluorescence image was assessed for at least 90 seconds after the dye became visible in the tissues. The surgical team meticulously evaluated tissue perfusion levels. In the cases of identifying ischemia or inadequate perfusion, the surgical plan was promptly adjusted to prevent postoperative complications (Figure 1).
Statistical analysis
A descriptive statistical analysis was conducted with Statistica software 13.PL (Tibco Software Inc., Palo Alto, California, United States). The normal distribution was checked using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Numbers and percentages were used for numerical variables. For continuous variables, mean (SD) or median (interquartile range [IQR]) were used when appropriate.
Ethics
The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. The study protocol was approved by the Bioethics Committee of Gdansk Medical Chamber (KB-33/24.)
Results
A total of 171 patients were included in the study. Of them, 83.6% were women. Mean (SD) age of the participants was 41.8 (9.8) years. Median (IQR) body mass index was 43.7 (40.8–49.5) kg/m2.
As many as 41.5% of the patients suffered from hypertension and 24.6%, from type 2 diabetes (Table 1).

Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
Men, n (%) | 28 (16.4) |
Age, y, mean (SD) | 41.8 (9.8) |
Preoperative BMI, kg/m2, median (IQR) | 43.7 (40.8–49.5) |
Length of stay, d, mean (SD) | 2.1 (0.8) |
Operative time, min, median (IQR) | 80 (60–115) |
Type 2 diabetes, n (%) | 42 (24.6) |
Hypertension, n (%) | 71 (41.5) |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range | |
In the analyzed group, 27 patients (15.8%) had allergies to pharmaceuticals and inhalants. Sixteen patients (9.4%) reported being allergic to antibiotics, 6 (3.5%), to pollen, 2 (1.2%), to metamizole, and 2 (1.2%), to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. One participant (0.6%) was allergic to iodine, 1 (0.6%), to tramadol, and 1 (0.6%), to salicylates. Nine patients (5.3%) had asthma. The iodine allergy was identified during follow-up when treating a wound unrelated to MBS. Despite previously undiagnosed iodine allergy, the intraoperative use of ICG increases the likelihood of an allergic reaction.
A total of 171 MBSs with ICG perfusion tests were performed, comprising 93 sleeve gastrectomies (SGs), 17 OAGBs, 51 RYGBs, 7 primary SADI-Ss, and 3 redo surgeries converting SG to SADI-S. Median (IQR) operation time was 80 (60–115) minutes, and mean (SD) length of hospital stay was 2.1 (0.8) days.
Ischemia
All patients undergoing SG and SADI-S had proper blood flow confirmed with fluorescence. In OAGB, 1 ischemia of the gastrointestinal anastomosis, and in RYGB, 1 ischemia of the terminal part of the enzymatic loop were detected. In the case of OAGB, ischemia was not visible prior to ICG administration. In RYGB, before ICG administration, the loop appeared darker, and ICG administration showed improper blood flow. The surgical strategy was changed intraoperatively in both cases, and the postoperative course was uneventful. Before the incorporation of ICG into surgical practice, the leakage rate in MBS in our center was 0.4%.
Safety profile
In the study group, no local or general adverse symptoms or complications, including allergic reactions, were observed after intravenous administration of ICG. The complications that occurred in the perioperative period were not related to fluorescence. The patients’ allergies did not influence the occurrence of adverse events related to the administration of ICG.
Complications
Complications occurred in 4 patients (2.3%). There were 2 cases (1.2%) of gastrointestinal bleeding, 1 after SG from the gastric sleeve staple line and another after RYGB from the gastrojejunal anastomosis staple line. Both cases required endoscopic intervention and were successfully managed, classified as Clavien–Dindo class 3a complications. Hospitalization was extended to 3 days after SG and 4 days after RYGB. In 1 SG patient (0.6%), the small intestine was perforated during the creation of pneumoperitoneum with an optical trocar. The perforation was detected on the second postoperative day. The patient required a revisional surgery (Clavien–Dindo class 3b) and a hospital stay of 12 days. In 1 patient (0.6%) undergoing SADI-S, the duodenum was ruptured by a barbed suture, causing leakage of methylene blue and the inability to suture the perforation. Intraoperatively, the decision was made to convert to OAGB (Clavien–Dindo class 3b). Hospitalization lasted 3 days. Posthospitalization period was uneventful in all cases.
Discussion
Among 171 MBSs performed using ICG, no early or long-term complications related to intravenous administration of the dye were observed. One miligram of ICG was sufficient in all cases to assess tissue blood flow. Fluorescence proved helpful in evaluating ischemia. It allowed the surgeons to intraoperatively modify the procedure and avoid 2 severe OAGB and RYGB procedure complications. The complications that actually occurred were not related to the administration of ICG. The study population was heterogeneous, which enabled us to assess the safety of fluorescence in all types of primary operations performed. The results seem to be relevant for ICG use in MBS. To our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the safety of ICG in these types of procedures.
The application of ICG is becoming increasingly prevalent across various medical disciplines.1-8 New opportunities for using ICG in surgical procedures continue to emerge each year. Fluorescence imaging, facilitated by ICG, is employed to evaluate adequate blood perfusion to organs or gastrointestinal anastomoses, and proves valuable in identifying primary tumors, lymph nodes, or metastases within parenchymal organs.9,10 Additionally, ICG is used for mapping the biliary tree, ureters, and thoracic duct, significantly lowering the risk of injury to these structures and minimizing associated complications.18-22 The use of ICG has expanded into emergency surgery, where it aids in the evaluation of post-traumatic changes and revascularization following vascular injuries, and it plays an essential role in burn management and reconstructive surgery.2-7,23 As the capabilities of ICG continue to evolve, its role in diagnostic and therapeutic interventions is expected to grow, further enhancing surgical precision and patient outcomes.
ICG in MBS has become an essential adjunct in evaluating tissue perfusion and identifying potential areas of ischemia. While the overall risk of compromised blood flow during these procedures is relatively low, ICG fluorescence imaging is a valuable tool for early detection of any abnormalities in tissue vascularization, which can help prevent ischemic complications.24-26 In addition, ICG fluorescence is also helpful in assessing the integrity of anastomoses, providing real-time visualization that can detect leaks.27,28 Furthermore, fluorescence is utilized as a marker to identify the source of bleeding in the gastrointestinal tract.29 Despite its growing use and potential benefits, the data on ICG fluorescence imaging in surgical treatment of obesity are still limited.30-35
The use of ICG is safe, and complications are infrequent. Severe adverse reactions occur in 0.05% of cases. In the available literature, there are 2 case reports of anaphylactic shock after intravenous ICG administration.36-38 The mechanism of the allergic reaction is not fully understood, but the proposed theory includes immunoglobulin E-mediated hypersensitivity, nonallergic histamine release, complement activation, and release of other inflammatory mediators. Chronic renal impairment predisposes to adverse effects.9,38-40
Some of the risk factors for an anaphylactic reaction include a history of allergic diseases, such as asthma, food allergy, or drug allergy. Additionally, hypertension and type 2 diabetes may increase this risk.38 In the observed group, the occurrence of inhalant, food, and drug allergies or asthma did not induce allergy to ICG.
The major limitations of the study are its single-center character and a relatively small, heterogeneous study group. The very low frequency of adverse events after ICG administration can introduce some bias. Severe complications may affect 0.05% of patients after dye administration, and further reports on larger cohorts are needed to reach final conclusions.8,38
Conclusions
This is the first publication assessing the safety of using ICG in MBS. ICG appears to be associated with a low risk of allergic complications, and its use may be beneficial in reducing ischemic complications. Given the exceedingly rare occurrence of allergic reactions following ICG administration, a comparative study with sufficient power would be necessary to reach definitive conclusions.
Mateusz Wityk, MD, Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Regional Health Centre, ul. Bema 5, 59-300 Lubin, Poland, phone: +48 608 439 585, email: mateuszwityk@gmail.com
May 7, 2025.
June 15, 2025.
July 4, 2025.
None.
The study was funded by the Minister of Science under the Regional Initiative of Excellence Program.
MW conceived the concept of the study. MW, ND, and MB contributed to the research design. All authors were involved in data collection. MW and MB analyzed the data. MW and ND coordinated and supervised the project. All authors edited and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Artificial intelligence was not used to write the article.
None declared.
Wityk M, Bobowicz M, Dowgiałło-Gornowicz N. Safety of indocyanine green use in bariatric and metabolic surgery. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2025; 20: 215-219. doi:10.20452/wiitm.2025.17964
- 1.
- Kudszus S, Roesel C, Schachtrupp A, Höer JJ. Intraoperative laser fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: a noninvasive analysis to reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010; 395: 1025-1030.Crossref
- 2.
- Valerio I, Green JM, Sacks JM, et al. Vascularized osseous flaps and assessing their bipartate perfusion pattern via intraoperative fluorescence angiography. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015; 31: 45-53.Crossref
- 3.
- Kamp MA, Sarikaya-Seiwert S, Petridis AK, et al. Intraoperative indocyanine green-based cortical perfusion assessment in patients suffering from severe traumatic brain injury. World Neurosurg. 2017; 101: 431-443.Crossref
- 4.
- Rother U, Lang W. Noninvasive measurements of tissue perfusion in critical limb ischemia. Gefasschirurgie. 2018; 23: 8-12.Crossref
- 5.
- Yamaguchi K, Abe T, Nakajima K, et al. Use of near-infrared imaging using indocyanine green associates with the lower incidence of postoperative complications for intestinal and mesenteric injury. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 23880.Crossref
- 6.
- Ghareeb PA, Neustein TM, Fang RC, Payne DE. Indocyanine green angiography: a helpful tool for intraoperative assessment of upper extremity perfusion. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2017; 21: 101-106.Crossref
- 7.
- Bigdeli AK, Gazyakan E, Schmidt VJ, et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence for free-flap perfusion imaging revisited: advanced decision making by virtual perfusion reality in visionsense fusion imaging angiography. Surg Innov. 2016; 23: 249-260.Crossref
- 8.
- Abdelrahman H, El-Menyar A, Peralta R, Al-Thani H. Application of indocyanine green in surgery: A review of current evidence and implementation in trauma patients. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023; 15: 757-775.
- 9.
- Li H, Xie X, Du F, et al. A narrative review of intraoperative use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in gastrointestinal cancer: situation and future directions. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023; 14: 1095-1113.Crossref
- 10.
- Yang Z, Wang P, Bao D, et al. Applicability of indocyanine green fluorescence tracing with subserosal dye injection in laparoscopic lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a preliminary study. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024; 19: 336-341.Crossref
- 11.
- Ogawa M, Kosaka N, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H. In vivo molecular imaging of cancer with a quenching near-infrared fluorescent probe using conjugates of monoclonal antibodies and indocyanine green. Cancer Res. 2009; 69: 1268-1272.Crossref
- 12.
- Moody ED, Viskari PJ, Colyer CL. Non-covalent labeling of human serum albumin with indocyanine green: a study by capillary electrophoresis with diode laser-induced fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1999; 729: 55-64.Crossref
- 13.
- Cherrick GR, Stein SW, Leevy CM, Davidson CS. Indocyanine green: observations on its physical properties, plasma decay, and hepatic extraction. J Clin Invest. 1960; 39: 592-600.Crossref
- 14.
- Reinhart MB, Huntington CR, Blair LJ, et al. Indocyanine green: historical context, current applications, and future considerations. Surg Innov. 2016; 23: 166-175.Crossref
- 15.
- Szeliga J, Wyleżoł M, Major P, et al. Metabolic and bariatric surgery chapter of the Association of Polish Surgeons. Bariatric and metabolic surgery care standards. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020; 15: 391-394.Crossref
- 16.
- Stenberg E, Dos Reis Falcão LF, O‘Kane M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations: a 2021 update. World J Surg. 2022; 46: 729-751.Crossref
- 17.
- Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009; 250: 187-196.Crossref
- 18.
- Verbeek FP, Schaafsma BE, Tummers QR, et al. Optimization of near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography for open and laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2014; 28: 1076-1082.Crossref
- 19.
- Liu YY, Liao CH, Diana M, et al. Near-infrared cholecystocholangiography with direct intragallbladder indocyanine green injection: preliminary clinical results. Surg Endosc. 2018; 32: 1506-1514.Crossref
- 20.
- Vecchiato M, Martino A, Sponza M, et al. Thoracic duct identification with indocyanine green fluorescence during minimally invasive esophagectomy with patient in prone position. Dis Esophagus. 2020; 33: doaa030.Crossref
- 21.
- Mahalingam SM, Putt KS, Srinivasarao M, Low PS. Design of a near infrared fluorescent ureter imaging agent for prevention of ureter damage during abdominal surgeries. Molecules. 2021; 26: 3739.Crossref
- 22.
- Siddighi S, Yune JJ, Hardesty J. Indocyanine green for intraoperative localization of ureter. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 211: 436.Crossref
- 23.
- Green JM, Sabino J, Fleming M, Valerio I. Intraoperative fluorescence angiography: a review of applications and outcomes in war-related trauma. Mil Med. 2015; 180: 37-43.Crossref
- 24.
- Pavone G, Tartaglia N, Pacilli M, et al. Leak after sleeve gastrectomy with positive intraoperative indocyanine green test: avoidable scenario? Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022; 95: 107168.Crossref
- 25.
- Pavone G, Fersini A, Pacilli M, et al. Can indocyanine green during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy be considered a new intraoperative modality for leak testing? BMC Surg. 2022; 22: 341.Crossref
- 26.
- Balla A, Corallino D, Quaresima S, et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography during laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a pilot study. Front Surg. 2022; 9: 906133.Crossref
- 27.
- Hagen ME, Diaper J, Douissard J, et al. Early experience with intraoperative leak test using a blend of methylene blue and indocyanine green during robotic gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2019; 29: 949-952.Crossref
- 28.
- Kalmar CL, Reed CM, Peery CL, Salzberg AD. Intraluminal indocyanine green for intraoperative staple line leak testing in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2020; 34: 4194-4199.Crossref
- 29.
- Copăescu C, Bîrlog C, Turcu F, Săftoiu A. A novel indocyanine green fluorescence-guided laparoscopic technique to map the site of obscure gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2021; 116: 89-101.Crossref
- 30.
- Ortega CB, Guerron AD, Yoo JS. The use of fluorescence angiography during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. JSLS. 2018; 22: e2018.00005.Crossref
- 31.
- Di Furia M, Romano L, Salvatorelli A et al. Indocyanine green fluorescent angiography during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2019; 29: 3786-3790.Crossref
- 32.
- Frattini F, Lavazza M, Mangano A, et al. Indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2015; 25: 949-950.Crossref
- 33.
- Garofalo F, Mongelli F, Cristaudi A, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass conversion to SADI-S with use of indocyanine green fluoroscopy. Obes Surg. 2022; 32: 2823-2824.Crossref
- 34.
- Olmi S, David G, Cesana G, et al. Modified sleeve gastrectomy combined with laparoscopic rossetti fundoplication and vascularization assessment with indocyanine green. Obes Surg. 2019; 29: 3086-3088.Crossref
- 35.
- Danin PE, Anty R, Patouraux S, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of NAFLD with indocyanine green clearance test: a preliminary study in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2018; 28: 735-742.Crossref
- 36.
- Olsen TW, Lim JI, Capone A Jr, et al. Anaphylactic shock following indocyanine green angiography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996; 114: 97.Crossref
- 37.
- Wolf S, Arend O, Schulte K, Reim M. Severe anaphylactic reaction after indocyanine green fluorescence angiography. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992; 114: 638-639.Crossref
- 38.
- Meira J, Marques ML, Falcão-Reis F, et al. Immediate reactions to fluorescein and indocyanine green in retinal angiography: review of literature and proposal for patient’s evaluation. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020; 14: 171-178.Crossref
- 39.
- Hope-Ross M, Yannuzzi LA, Gragoudas ES, et al. Adverse reactions due to indocyanine green. Ophthalmology. 1994; 101: 529-533.Crossref
- 40.
- Obana A, Miki T, Hayashi,K et al. Survey of complications of indocyanine green angiography in Japan. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994; 118: 749-753.Crossref