logo
Original articles

Effect of day- and night-time admissions on long-term clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention

Rafał Januszek1,2, Zbigniew Siudak3, Agnieszka Janion-Sadowska3, Magdalena Jędrychowska2, Bartłomiej Staszczak2, Jerzy Bartuś2, Krzysztof Plens4, Stanisław Bartuś2,5, Dariusz Dudek2,6
1 Department of Clinical Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education, Kraków, Poland
2 Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital, Kraków, Poland
3 Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
4 Kraków Cardiovascular Research Institute, Kraków, Poland
5 Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
6 Department of Interventional Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
DOI: 10.20452/pamw.15398
Published online: May 28, 2020.
Key words: acute myocardial infarction, clinical outcomes, night and day hours, pain-to-balloon time, primary percutaneous coronary intervention
CCBYNCSACC BY-NC-SA 4.0

In this article
Abstract

Introduction: It has been suggested that the time of admission during the day and night may influence the clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of day- and night‑time admissions on the clinical outcomes of patients with AMI undergoing PCI.

Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study was based on the data on PCIs performed in Poland from January 2014 to December 2017, prospectively collected in the National Registry of Invasive Cardiology Procedures (ORPKI). Day hours were defined as the time interval between 7:00 am and 10:59 pm. The study endpoints included the all‑cause in‑hospital mortality rate and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) at 30‑day, 12‑month, and 36‑month follow‑up.

Results: A total of 2919 patients were included in the study (2462 [84.3%] treated during the day hours). ST‑segment elevation myocardial infarction (1993 [68.3%]) was the main indication for PCI. We demonstrated that the 30‑day mortality rate was significantly higher in patients treated during the night hours than during the day hours (P = 0.01). Night hours were also among the independent predictors of increased 30‑day mortality (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.11–2.16; P = 0.01). No significant differences were observed in in‑hospital, 12‑month, and 36‑month mortality rates between patients treated during the night and day hours. There were no significant differences in the MACCE rates at the follow‑up timepoints.

Conclusions: Primary PCI for AMI is associated with increased 30‑day mortality among patients treated during the night hours compared with those managed during the day hours.

What's new?

It has been suggested that admission during the day and at night may influence the clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to investigate that association based on data from the National Registry of Invasive Cardiology Procedures (Polish, Ogólnopolski Rejestr Procedur Kardiologii Inwazyjnej [ORPKI]). We demonstrated that the 30‑day mortality rate was significantly higher in patients treated during the night hours than during the day hours. The night hours were also among the independent predictors of increased 30‑day mortality. The in‑hospital, 12‑month, and 36‑month all‑cause mortality were nonsignificantly higher in patients treated during the night hours compared with the day hours.

Introduction

According to existing data, it has been suggested that hospital admission during the day and at night may influence the short- and long‑term clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).1,2 The majority of studies on this issue focus on patients with ST‑segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).1,2 There are conflicting results regarding the outcomes of patients with STEMI undergoing off‑hour (weekday nights, weekends, and holidays) pPCI.1-7 Some investigators have reported higher mortality rates in that population,1-4 while others showed no differences.5-7 Healthcare delivery variations, the degree of catheterization laboratory loading in the scheduled mode of the day, traffic volume during the day and night, fatigue, and operators’ experience are listed among the factors that could potentially influence this association.8

Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the impact of day- and night‑time PCIs on patients’ long‑term clinical outcomes, considering the effect of the time from symptom onset to PCI and the type of myocardial infarction.

Patients and methods

Study design, population, and eligibility criteria

This retrospective cohort study was based on the data prospectively collected in the National Registry of Invasive Cardiology Procedures (Polish, Ogólnopolski Rejestr Procedur Kardiologii Inwazyjnej [ORPKI]). The registry was described elsewhere.9 All consecutive patients admitted between January 2014 and December 2017, diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) according to the current European guidelines,10,11 and treated with PCI were included in this study. Then, the data received from the ORPKI registry were matched with the data from the Polish National Health Fund (Polish, Narodowy Fundusz Zdrowia [NFZ]). When merging the databases, the following characteristics were considered: age, sex, catheterization laboratory, and the date of the procedure. The data analyzed here came from the Świętokrzyskie Province and included procedures carried out in the above specified period in 7 catheterization laboratories. We evaluated the subsequent follow‑up timepoints obtained from the NFZ records after 30, 183, 365, and 1095 days in order to compare them with the results of previous studies. None of the study patients were lost to follow‑up. Hospitals and catheterization laboratories participating in our study were included into the 24/7 network providing pPCI. Since the ORPKI registry is based on current clinical practice data, only standard written informed consent for PCI and data collection was obtained from the study patients. The study protocol complied with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study definitions

Day hours were defined as the time interval between 7:00 am and 10:59 pm, whereas night hours as the time interval between 11:00 pm and 6:59 am.

Pain‑to‑balloon (PTB) time was defined as the time from the AMI symptom onset to the first inflation of a catheter balloon within the culprit lesion. All study patients were divided into groups by PTB times: patients with a PTB time shorter than 3 hours (group 1), patients with a PTB time longer than 3 hours but shorter than 12 hours (group 2), and patients with a PTB time longer than 12 hours but shorter than 24 hours (group 3). The overall group of patients with AMI was also evaluated for the type of AMI: STEMI and non–ST‑segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). First‑medical‑contact‑to‑balloon time was defined as the time from the first medical contact of the patient with AMI to catheter balloon inflation in the culprit artery.

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention protocol

Both intervention strategy and device choice were at the discretion of the attending physician. Pharmacological treatment was administered according to current guidelines.10,11

Study endpoints

The primary study endpoints included all‑cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). The latter involved coronary revascularization (repeated percutaneous coronary revascularization or coronary artery bypass grafting), cerebral stroke or transient ischemic attacks, myocardial infarction, and the overall mortality rate.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were presented as number and percentage. Continuous variables were expressed as mean (SD) or median (interquartile range) where applicable. Normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Equality of variances was evaluated with the Levene test. Differences between the 2  study groups were compared using the Student or Welch t test depending on the equality of variances for normally distributed variables. The Mann–Whitney test was used for nonnormally distributed continuous variables. Categorical variables were compared with the Pearson χ2 or the Fisher exact test. Multiple group comparisons were performed using the analysis of variance or the Kruskal–Wallis test. The Tukey–Kramer honest significant difference test or the Steel–Dwass method were used for post hoc comparisons. For categorical parameters and survival analyses, the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure was applied to adjust the P value. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were performed to identify the predictors of MACCEs and death. Factors included in the adjusted model were as follows: admission time, type of MI, age, smoking status, hypertension, Killip class, sex, diabetes, kidney disease, previous stroke, previous MI, previous PCI, cardiac arrest at baseline, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, treatment with acetylsalicylic acid at baseline, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade before and after PCI. All statistical analyses were performed with the JMP software, version 14.2.0 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina, United States), and statistical tests were 2‑sided (a P value less than 0.05 was considered significant).

Results

General characteristics

The total number of patients included in the study was 2919. Among them, there were 2462 patients treated during the day hours (84.3%) and 457 patients treated during the night hours (15.7%). The main indication for PCI was STEMI, which was reported in 1993 patients (68.3%), whereas NSTEMI was noted in 926 patients (31.7%). The PTB time of up to 3 hours (group 1) was recorded in 1000 patients (34.3%), longer than 3 hours but not exceeding 12 hours (group 2) in 1452 (49.7%), and longer than 12 hours but shorter than 24 hours (group 3) in 467 (16%).

Pain‑to‑balloon time

Patients treated for AMI, when assessed by the PTB time, were older in group 3 compared with groups 1 and 2 (<⁠0.001). The greatest percentage of patients treated during the day hours was seen in group 3 compared with groups 1 and 2 (<⁠0.001). Pharmacological treatment received by the study patients is presented in table 1. Patients from groups 2 and 3 were more often treated via radial access (<⁠0.001). These and other procedural characteristics are summarized in table 2.

Table 1. Baseline clinical characteristics of the study patients by time from pain onset to balloon inflation, day and night admission hours, and type of myocardial infarction
0–3 hours (n [%], 1000 [34.2])
3–12 hours (n [%], 1452 [49.7])
12–24 hours (n [%], 467 [16])
Day (n [%], 2462 [84.3])
Night (n [%], 457 [15.7])
NSTEMI (n [%], 926 [31.7])
STEMI (n [%], 1993 [68.3])
Contribution statement: RJ, ZS, MJ, BS, and JB contributed to study design and drafted the manuscript. KP performed statistical analyses, interpreted the results, and critically revised the results presented in the manuscript. DD, SB, ZS, and AJS collected the data, drafted and critically revised the manuscript. All authors edited, read, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
References
  1. Magid DJ, Wang Y, Herrin J, et al. Relationship between time of day, day of week, timeliness of reperfusion, and in‑hospital mortality for patients with acute ST‑segment elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2005; 294: 803‑812. | Crossref
  2. Henriques JP, Haasdijk AP, Zijlstra F; Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Outcome of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction during routine duty hours versus during off‑hours. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 2138‑2142. | Crossref
  3. Kostis WJ, Demissie K, Marcella SW, et al; Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System (MIDAS 10) Study Group. Weekend versus weekday admission and mortality from myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1099‑1109. | Crossref
  4. Glaser R, Naidu SS, Selzer F, et al. Factors associated with poorer prognosis for patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention during off‑hours: biology or systems failure? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008; 1: 681‑688. | Crossref
  5. Ortolani P, Marzocchi A, Marrozzini C, et al. Clinical comparison of “normal‑hours” vs “off‑hours” percutaneous coronary interventions for ST‑elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2007; 154: 366‑372. | Crossref