Introduction
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become a challenge for healthcare systems around the world. In this extraordinary situation, patients with chronic diseases such as heart failure (HF) are especially at risk and require special attention.1 The implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is a procedure which has been used to reduce the mortality in this group of patients for many years.2 Over the last years, the introduction of remote monitoring of ICDs and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (CRT-D defibrillators) has significantly improved the prognosis in patients with HF3 and its role may be even more substantial in the current difficult reality. The aim of the present study was to analyze the rate of life threatening interventions in remotely monitored patients with HF and ICD or CRT-Ds during the first month of the COVID-19 outbreak.
Patients and methods
We performed an analysis in consecutive patients with HF enrolled to the Contemporary Modalities in Treatment of Heart Failure Registry (COMMIT-HF)4 and who had ICD or CRT-Ds implanted under the care of a dedicated Monitoring Center in a high-volume cardiovascular center. The study compared interventions from a 1-month period beginning with the outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic in Poland (March 14, 2020) and the corresponding period of 2019. The primary outcome was the overall rate of interventions (arrhythmias, device interventions, and clinical reactions). The percentage of interventions was calculated in relation to the number of supervised patients in the observed periods. The study was approved by an appropriate institutional review board and a written informed consent was not required given the retrospective nature of the analysis.
Results and discussion
We assessed 815 remotely monitored patients in the study period and 1326 patients in the control period. The baseline clinical characteristics including ischemic or nonischemic etiology of HF, history of previous atrial fibrillation, as well as primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death as the reason for ICD implantation and pharmacological treatment were similar within the study groups, except for a higher percentage of diabetes mellitus (36.5% vs 30.9%; P = 0.017) and chronic kidney disease stage III to V (29.9% vs 24.0%; P = 0.018) in the control group. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a significantly higher rate of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias (4.91% vs 1.28%; P <0.001), appropriate (0.98% vs 2.21%; P = 0.02) and inappropriate (2.33% vs 1.13%; P <0.001) ICD interventions, and clinical reactions (10.31% vs 4.3%; P <0.001), as compared with the control period. An increase in the percentage of all interventions during the pandemic period was found compared to the corresponding period of the previous year (13.37% vs 5.73%; P <0.001; Table 1). Possible reasons for this appear to include the organizational changes in the healthcare system and a greater level of stress among patients.5
Variable | Study perioda (n = 815) | Control periodb (n = 1326) | P value |
---|---|---|---|
Any RM center reaction (ICD intervention and / or clinical reaction) | 109 (13.4) | 76 (5.73) | <0.001 |
Appropriate ICD intervention | 18 (2.21) | 13 (0.98) | 0.02 |
VT | 14 (1.72) | 11 (0.83) | 0.05 |
ATP during VT | 14 (1.72) | 7 (0.53) | 0.007 |
Shock during VT | 2 (0.25) | 3 (0.23) | 0.93 |
VF | 5 (0.61) | 4 (0.3) | 0.27 |
Shock during VF | 5 (0.61) | 4 (0.3) | 0.29 |
Inappropriate ICD intervention | 19 (2.33) | 15 (1.13) | 0.03 |
Any arrhythmia | 40 (4.91) | 17 (1.28) | <0.001 |
AF episode | 21 (2.58) | 5 (0.38) | <0.001 |
Any clinical reaction | 84 (10.3) | 57 (4.3) | <0.001 |
Phone contact | 83 (10.18) | 56 (4.22) | <0.001 |
Pharmacotherapy change | 16 (1.96) | 3 (0.23) | <0.001 |
Urgent hospitalization | 19 (2.33) | 13 (0.98) | 0.012 |
Data are presented as number (percentage) of all patients with ICDs and under remote monitoring. a The study period was defined as the time between the introduction of a state of epidemic as by the Polish government (March 14, 2020) and April 14, 2020. b The control period was form March 14, 2019 to April 14, 2019. Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; ATP, antitachycardia pacing; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; RM, remote monitoring; VT, ventricular tachycardia; VF, ventricular fibrillation |
This study shows a 2.5-fold increase in any intervention in patients with HF and implanted ICD or CRT-Ds during the first months of the COVID-19 outbreak. Remote monitoring may be an effective way to care for patients with HF. Further severity of COVID-19 is expected. Therefore, a broader implementation of remote monitoring care of patients with HF and ICD or CRT-Ds should be considered.
Mateusz Tajstra, MD, PhD, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, ul. Mari Skłodowskiej-Curie 9, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland, phone: +48 32 373 36 74, email: mateusztajstra@wp.pl
June 10, 2020.
June 22, 2020.
July 8, 2020.
None declared.
Tajstra M, Kurek A, Pyka Ł, Gąsior M. The increased rate of life-threatening interventions in remotely monitored patients with heart failure during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2020; 130: 913-914. doi:10.20452/pamw.15505
- 1.
- Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020; 395: 1054-1062.Crossref
- 2.
- Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group, 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37: 2129-2200.
- 3.
- Hindricks G, Varma N, Kacet S, et al. Daily remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: insights from the pooled patient-level data from three randomized controlled trials (IN-TIME, ECOST, TRUST). Eur Heart J. 2017; 38: 1749-1755.Crossref
- 4.
- Gasior M, Pyka L, Gorol J, et al. Contemporary modalities in treatment of heart failure: report from the COMMIT-HF Registry. Kardiol Pol. 2016; 74: 523-528.Crossref
- 5.
- Finlay MC, Lambiase PD, Ben-Simon R, Taggart P. Effect of mental stress on dynamic electrophysiological properties of the endocardium and epicardium in humans. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13: 175-182.Crossref