To the editor

We have read with great interest a recent article by Zeng et al,1 who described a notable relevance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to identify patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As low levels of leukocytes and, conversely, high levels of neutrophils are observed in patients with a severe status of COVID-19, the NLR can exaggerate the converse direction of neutrophils and lymphocytes. This finding is clinically useful, because the NLR is easily calculated during routine blood tests even at community clinics and hospitals (where many patients with COVID-19 are seen).

We would like to provide some suggestions related to the use of the NLR. Although the NLR measured at a single point was reported in most studies, as analyzed in the article by Zeng et al,1 the nadir (the lowest point) for leukocytes and the peak (the highest point) for neutrophils can differ during the clinical course of COVID-19. For instance, early lymphopenia and late neutropenia have been reported during the course of influenza.2 In our experience of treating an adult patient with severe COVID-19, such phenomena were indeed observed (Figure 1). Monitoring the NLR (eg, by the change rate) may produce a sensible finding of the disease conditions. Additionally, the cutoff values of the NLR remain to be determined in order to predict the severity of COVID-19. It is seemingly necessary to establish the cutoff values considering the transiently different behaviors of both leukocytes and neutrophils. Further studies to effectively use the NRL are therefore warranted.

Figure 1. Changes in the neutrophil count (A), lymphocyte count (B), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (C) in a patient with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (a recovered case). The lowest count of lymphocytes was seen early. The highest neutrophil count was seen following the lowest leukocyte count, and the lowest neutrophil count was noted later.

a Y axis shows changes in concentrations with regard to baseline values.