To the editor
Introduction
In light of new emerging data and accumulated experience, it became necessary to amend the recommendations of the Polish Association of Epidemiologists and Infectiologists (Polskie Towarzystwo Epidemiologów i Lekarzy Chorób Zakaźnych [PTEiLChZ]) for the management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection published on March 31, 2020 and the subsequent amendments regarding pharmacotherapy, introduced in Annex no. 1 as of June 8, 2020.1,2
The objective of the PTEiLChZ recommendations is to provide practical guidelines for the diagnostic workup and pharmacotherapy of SARS-CoV-2 infection, which would be useful both in primary healthcare and hospital settings. The recommendations are based on published research findings and the authors’ own experience, but they do not include detailed guidelines for patient management in intensive care units (ICUs) with regard to mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
The changes introduced to the recommendations relate both to primary and supportive treatment at successive stages of the disease (Table 1) and the diagnostic workup of SARS-CoV-2 infection. They emerged as a consequence of the rapid accumulation of knowledge on the efficacy (or inefficacy) of therapeutic options under consideration.3 The results of subsequent studies have confirmed the benefit of using remdesivir at the stage of viral multiplication as well as immunomodulatory drugs and / or glucocorticosteroids at the cytokine storm stage (Flisiak et al 2020, unpublished data).4-8 Moreover, the rationale behind convalescent plasma and low-molecular-weight heparin use has been validated.9,10 Based on evidence showing that lopinavir / ritonavir, chloroquine, and hydroxychloroquine are not therapeutically effective, they were finally excluded from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment.11-13 Also, studies have failed to demonstrate any therapeutic benefit of azithromycin, favipiravir, ruxolitinib, oseltamivir, opaganib, and verdinexor use.
Disease stage | Primary treatment | Supportive treatment |
---|---|---|
Stage 1:
|
| |
Stage 2:
|
|
|
Stage 3:
|
|
|
Stage 4:
|
|
|
a Tocilizumab can be used after bioethics committee approval. Abbreviations: ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; ICU, intensive care unit; IL-6, interleukin 6; SpO2, oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry |
Diagnostic recommendations
Preliminary remarks
Testing of potentially infectious material (swabs from the upper or lower airways including pharyngeal, nasopharyngeal, and nasal swabs, samples of sputum, saliva, and bronchopulmonary washing) regardless of the test used (molecular, antigen, or serological) should be performed in strict compliance with the epidemiological safety procedures to minimize the risk of transmitting infection to the staff. The results of molecular and antigen tests do not determine the replication activity or infectivity of SARS-CoV-2, so the periods of infectivity should be defined on the basis of in vitro tests and not the results of diagnostic tests. There are no firm data available regarding the period of infectivity in immunodeficient individuals and it may be prolonged.14
Molecular diagnostic workup
Techniques detecting the SARS-CoV-2 genetic material (nucleic acid amplification testing), including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques with real-time signal detection (real-time PCR, nested PCR) or isothermal amplification methods, are the basis for the diagnosis of active SARS-CoV-2 infection. Tests detecting viral genetic material should be performed in individuals meeting the criteria for suspected COVID-19. Rapid molecular tests (yielding results within 45 to 60 minutes) meet all the requirements applicable to genetic testing methods and are particularly useful in admission rooms of infectious disease wards and in hospital emergency departments where they facilitate patient triage. The optimal time for performing a molecular test is the period of viral replication in the upper respiratory tract epithelium, which usually lasts up to day 10 after the onset of clinical symptoms.15 After this time interval, the sensitivity of molecular tests gradually decreases, falling below 50% 14 days after disease onset.16
Serological tests
Serological tests evaluate the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 during and after acute infection. Although neutralizing antibodies have been detected in the majority of patients after laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, there are incomplete data as to how long the antibodies remain present after past infection and whether they maintain the protective function.17 Serological tests can cross-detect antibodies against other pathogenic coronaviruses, and the risk of cross-reactions depends on the type of antibodies detected. When using serological tests, including rapid cassette tests, a high degree of caution should be exercised with regard to the manufacturer’s notes on test sensitivity and specificity. It is advisable to validate test sensitivity and specificity in the local population. Serological tests (based on enzyme immunoassay techniques and their variants) detecting antibodies are not useful for the diagnosis of early COVID-19 because of their insufficient sensitivity. However, they can be performed to improve diagnostic reliability in patients with negative molecular test results who present typical clinical and radiological manifestations, especially at disease stages 2 to 4; in the diagnostic workup of postinflammatory syndromes developing as a complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection; in epidemiological studies evaluating the immune status of the population (incidence rates and epidemiological modeling), and to identify convalescents for the purpose of obtaining therapeutic plasma (specific antibodies).
Rapid immunoserological tests
Because of extremely low sensitivity and specificity, the currently available rapid cassette tests detecting antibodies should not be used for either the diagnosis of active disease or the assessment of patients’ immune status. Rapid antibody cassette tests should be validated and evaluated based on reliable studies conducted independently of the test manufacturer, the epidemiology of infections with SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses in a particular area, and own experience verified by the results of genetic tests.
Antigen tests
The use of antigen tests in clinical practice is limited to the initial period of infection, when the viral load in the test material reaches the highest level (typically 5 to 7 days after the onset of clinical symptoms depending on the test manufacturer). The majority of antigen tests detecting SARS-CoV-2 proteins are characterized by medium sensitivity and high specificity, so both negative and positive results should be confirmed by a molecular test. First-generation antigen tests (developed at the outset of the pandemic) were of limited use in the diagnostic workup of COVID-19, as their sensitivity reached approximately 40%. Second-generation antigen tests (for example those detecting the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein), which became available in September 2020, require further evaluation in clinical practice. The interpretation of negative results should be correlated with clinical data and the disease stage (late stages—including the cytokine storm and acute respiratory distress syndrome—are associated with an increased likelihood of obtaining false negative results). There are no data on the use of antigen tests in asymptomatic populations and for the assessment of infectivity. The characteristics of the antigen test used should include not only its sensitivity and specificity ranges but also a clear definition of the antigen type to be detected (eg, SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid); tests not labeled with such information should not be used owing to diagnostic unreliability.
Therapeutic recommendations
Stage 1
In the vast majority of patients (80%–90%), SARS-CoV-2 infection develops with no or mild symptoms and such individuals do not require hospitalization. However, in some cases, this clinical form may represent stage 1 of the disease, preceding the fully symptomatic stage 2 (Table 1). Stage 1 patients followed up by a primary care physician usually require no treatment, and monitoring of their clinical status is a sufficient management option. Here, the currently tested electronic monitoring systems for oxygen saturation (SpO2), which should not be lower than 95%, may be useful. However, baseline oxygen saturation in patients with chronic respiratory diseases can be decreased, which does not necessarily mean that SARS-CoV-2–induced respiratory failure is progressing. If symptoms arise, patients may require antipyretic agents. Of note, patients with stage 1 disease should not be treated with glucocorticosteroids. These drugs have been shown to be ineffective in patients who do not require oxygen therapy. Furthermore, using glucocorticosteroids too early may increase the viral replication rate and, hence, worsen patient prognosis.6 Treatment with antibiotics, anti-influenza drugs, vitamin D, or low-molecular-weight heparin is not recommended in SARS-CoV-2 infection, unless it is required because of another medical condition.
If the patient’s condition worsens, referral to the hospital should be considered. A potentially helpful tool for the evaluation of indications for hospitalization is the CRB-65 score designed for grading the severity of pneumonia. The score includes the following risk factors: confusion (1 point), respiratory rate ≥30 breaths per minute (1 point), blood pressure ≤90/60 mm Hg (1 point), and age >65 years (1 point). If a patient scores 2 points, hospital referral should be considered, whereas patients scoring 3 or 4 points should be referred to the hospital. If the patient’s condition is good, remote forms of contact (phone and video calls) and patient self-diagnosis (measurement of pulse and respiratory rates) should be considered and the patient needs to be counseled about alarm symptoms.
Stage 2
The increased severity of COVID-19 symptoms indicates the development of stage 2 disease, in which patients require hospitalization owing to the potential need for oxygen therapy, thromboembolic prevention, and antiviral treatment (Table 1). Remdesivir is the only currently approved antiviral drug, which should be used for 5 days. Longer therapy (10-day treatment was initially recommended) does not bring any additional benefits (Flisiak et al 2020, unpublished data).5,18 Low doses of dexamethasone should be considered in patients treated with remdesivir and concurrent oxygen therapy in order to prevent the cytokine storm.6 Also, convalescent plasma may be administered as part of antiviral therapy at this stage of the disease.
Stage 3
Clinical deterioration despite antiviral therapy—which can be manifested by increased dyspnea and a drop in SpO2 below 90% in spite of oxygen therapy—may indicate the development of stage 3 disease, in which the cytokine storm plays a key role. In some patients, the risk of life-threatening effects can be reduced by using tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist.8,19 Low-dose glucocorticosteroid treatment can also be implemented for the same purpose (Table 1).6
Stage 4
Further deterioration of the patient’s condition despite following appropriate management strategies indicates the development of stage 4 disease, ie, acute respiratory distress syndrome. The patient should be transferred to the ICU, as it is highly possible that they would require mechanical ventilation. At this stage of the disease, it is frequently advisable to administer relatively high doses of glucocorticosteroids and, typically, empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy against microbiological factors, which are probably responsible for infections in a particular ICU (Table 1).
Important notes
- Treatment with remdesivir in patients who do not require oxygen therapy and those after the stage of viral multiplication (typically one week after the onset of symptoms) is of no benefit and has no clinical justification.
- Furthermore, there is no rationale for using antibiotics (eg, azithromycin), chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir / ritonavir, anti-influenza drugs (oseltamivir, favipiravir), and vitamin D for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
- Glucocorticosteroids used at stage 1 of the disease may increase the risk of an adverse course of COVID-19 owing to their potential effect on viral replication. Low doses of glucocorticosteroids at disease stage 2 are acceptable, provided that antiviral drugs (remdesivir) are concurrently administered.
Robert Flisiak, Miłosz Parczewski, Andrzej Horban, Jerzy Jaroszewicz, Dorota Kozielewicz, Małgorzata Pawłowska, Anna Piekarska, Krzysztof Simon, Krzysztof Tomasiewicz, Dorota Zarębska-Michaluk (RF: Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland; MPar: Department of Infectious, Tropical Diseases and Acquired Immunodeficiency, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; AH: Department of Infectious Diseases for Adults, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland; JJ: Department of Infectious Diseases in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland; DK and MPaw: Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland; AP: Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland; KS: Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland; KT: Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland; DZ-M: Department of Infectious Diseases, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland)
Prof. Robert Flisiak, MD, PhD, Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Bialystok, ul. Żurawia 14, 15-540 Białystok, Poland, phone: +48 85 741 69 21, email: robert.flisiak1@gmail.com
The Polish version of the article is available at www.mp.pl.
We are grateful to Professor Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas for contributing constructive suggestions in the field of primary healthcare.
None declared.
Flisiak R, Parczewski M, Horban A, et al. Management of SARS-CoV-2 infection: recommendations of the Polish Association of Epidemiologists and Infectiologists. Annex no. 2 as of October 13, 2020. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2020; 130: 915-918. doi:10.20452/pamw.15658
- 1.
- Flisiak R, Horban A, Jaroszewicz J, et al. Management of SARS-CoV-2 infection: recommendations of the Polish Association of Epidemiologists and Infectiologists as of March 31, 2020. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2020; 130: 352-357.Crossref
- 2.
- Flisiak R, Horban A, Jaroszewicz J, et al. Management of SARS-CoV-2 infection: recommendations of the Polish Association of Epidemiologists and Infectiologists. Annex no. 1 as of June 8, 2020. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2020; 130: 557-558.Crossref
- 3.
- Flisiak R, Zarębska-Michaluk D. Knowledge is coming so fast that a meta-analysis of COVID-19 treatment is always too late. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2020; 130: 721-723.Crossref
- 4.
- Beigel JH, Tomashek KM, Dodd LE, et al. Remdesivir for the treatment of Covid-19 – final report. N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8. [Epub ahead of print].
- 5.
- Goldman JD, Lye DCB, Hui DS, et al. Remdesivir for 5 or 10 days in patients with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 27. [Epub ahead of print].
- 6.
- The RECOVERY Collaborative Group. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19 – preliminary report. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 17. [Epub ahead of print].
- 7.
- Rosas I, Bräu N, Waters M, et al. Tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. MedRxiv. 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.27.20183442.
- 8.
- Tomasiewicz K, Piekarska A, Stempkowska-Rejek J, et al. Tocilizumab for patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective, multi-center study. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020 Aug 1. [Epub ahead of print].Crossref
- 9.
- Tang N, Bai H, Chen X, et al. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. J Thromb Haemost. 2020. 18: 1094‐1099.Crossref
- 10.
- Ye M, Fu D, Ren Y, et al. Treatment with convalescent plasma for COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China. J Med Virol. 2020 Apr 15. [Epub ahead of print].Crossref
- 11.
- RECOVERY Collaborative Group. Lopinavir-ritonavir in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial. Lancet. 2020 Oct 5. [Epub ahead of print].
- 12.
- The RECOVERY Collaborative Group. Effect of Hydroxychloroquine in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8. [Epub ahead of print].
- 13.
- Kashour Z, Riaz M, Garbati MA, et al. Efficacy of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Oct 8. [Epub ahead of print].
- 14.
- Widders A, Broom A, Broom J. SARS-CoV-2: the viral shedding vs infectivity dilemma. Infect Dis Health. 2020; 25: 210-215.Crossref
- 15.
- Liu L, Liu W, Zhenget Y, et al. A preliminary study on serological assay for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 238 admitted hospital patients. Microbes Infect. 2020 Mar 8. [Epub ahead of print].
- 16.
- Zhao J, Yuan Q, Wang H, et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 28. [Epub ahead of print].Crossref
- 17.
- Harvala H, Mehew J, Robb ML, et al. Convalescent plasma treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection: analysis of the first 436 donors in England, 22 April to 12 May 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020; 25: 2001260.Crossref
- 18.
- Veklury – summary of product characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/veklury-epar-product-information_pl.pdf. Accessed October 22, 2020.
- 19.
- RoActemra – summary of product characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/roactemra-epar-product-information_pl.pdf. Accessed October 22, 2020.