Introduction
Degenerative aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in European countries. The burden of this disease on public health and healthcare resources is expected to rise due to population aging observed in developed countries. Valve replacement is the only effective treatment for patients with symptomatic AS with otherwise poor prognosis, as no medical therapy modifies the progression of the disease. In the last decade, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been introduced to treat patients with AS safely and effectively.1-3 However, differences in regulatory, economic, and social circumstances cause disparities in TAVI adoption and practice in Europe.4 Few studies assessed TAVI development in Poland, the sixth most populated country of the European Union. Also, there is a paucity of data on TAVI activity and practice in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe.4-7 We sought to address this gap by evaluating the progress and status of TAVI in Poland using a national web-based survey. The specific aims of the study were to analyze the adoption of TAVI in Poland and to detect differences among Polish centers in practice and decision-making. Since 2015, Poland has been one of the beneficiaries of the Valve for Life Initiative of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Intervention (EAPCI), which provided resources for the education of physicians, patients, and healthcare authorities. The long-term aim of the Valve for Life Initiative is to reduce disparities across Europe and increase the availability of effective treatment for valvular heart disease. The Valve for Life Initiative in Poland has been extended into 2020 because, despite its success, there is still an unmet need for wider access to timely valve replacement even in the high-risk group.8 The current publication is a continuation of the first report published in 2017.7
Patients and methods
The survey investigated TAVI practice in Polish centers. It consisted of 94 single- and multiple-choice questions focused on the following topics: 1) characteristics of TAVI centres in Poland; 2) the annual number of TAVI procedures in the years 2008 to 2019; 3) pre-, intra-, and postprocedural management of patients; and 4) a list of TAVI team members in the participating center. It was obligatory to answer all questions with the possibility to comment on any of them. The survey was published online (https://picts.pl), and formal invitations were sent to all Polish TAVI teams to participate. Responses were collected electronically by the end of December 2020.
The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. As the research protocol of this prospective, observational study did not involve any patient data, it did not require additional approval of an ethics committee.
We defined the penetration rate as a measure of actual TAVI use relative to its potential use in patients with symptomatic severe AS at prohibitive, high, medium, and low surgical risk, who could potentially be treated with TAVI. The number of annual potential TAVI candidates was estimated using the already published model.9 Reports of the Polish Central Statistical Office were used to estimate the number of inhabitants aged 65 years and older for TAVI penetration analysis as well as to calculate an annual number of TAVI implants per 1 000 000 inhabitants.
Statistical analysis
Continuous and categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages. The TAVI forecast was performed using the Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model using stationary R2 as a goodness-of-fit measure. All data analyses were conducted using the SPSS statistical software, version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, United States).
Results
All 23 Polish TAVI sites participated in the study: 1 institute, 14 university hospitals, 6 community hospitals, and 2 private hospitals (Figure 1). Following the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines10 and recommendations of the Polish position paper,3 23 multidisciplinary Transcatheter Heart Teams have been established, with 105 operators, including 59 interventional cardiologists and 46 cardiothoracic surgeons. The centers differed in terms of TAVI volume. Since 2008, 4 centers performed more than 500, while 10 centers performed less than 200 procedures in total (Figure 2). In 2019, 5 centers performed more than 100 TAVIs and 8 performed less than 50.
Between 2008 and 2019, the cumulative number of TAVI procedures performed in Poland was 6910. The annual TAVI volume growth rate was positive during all years, and in 2019 it increased by 23% (to 1550 procedures) as compared with the previous year (Figures 3, 4A and 4B). The annual number of TAVI procedures per 1 000 000 inhabitants rose from 0.21 (1.55 in individuals aged ≥65 years) in 2008 to 40.38 (223.12 in individuals aged ≥65 years) in 2019 (Figure 4A and 4B). The 5-year forecast of TAVI procedures in Poland was calculated using the ARIMA (0,2,2) model based on historical data from the years 2008 to 2019 and following autocorrelation function plots. The projected number of TAVI procedures in 2024 was 3663 (lower control limit, 3486; upper control limit, 3839; Figure 3).
Based on the recently published algorithm,9 we assessed the number of TAVI-eligible patients in 2019. Among patients aged 65 years and older who could not qualify for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in 2019, the TAVI penetration rate was 18.65% (Supplementary material, Table S1).9
All centers performed TAVI in inoperable and high-risk patients (Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS] score >8). Medium-risk patients were referred for TAVI in 18 centers, while low-risk patients (STS score <4) were offered transcatheter treatment in 5 centers.
TAVI-specific multislice computed tomography imaging of the heart and peripheral vessels was mandatory in all centers as part of preprocedural planning. Transesophageal echocardiography was routinely used in 7 hospitals.
If a patient was diagnosed with significant coronary artery disease, a strategy of preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of main vessels was used by default in all centers. In 3 of them, such patients were referred for simultaneous PCI during TAVI procedure, and only 4 centers decided to postpone PCI in such circumstances.
In patients with coronary artery disease scheduled for TAVI via the femoral approach using surgical cutdown or closure devices, 19 centers allowed for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to be maintained during TAVI. In patients referred for the procedure via the transapical access, 5 centers allowed for DAPT, 7 recommended aspirin only, and 10 stopped antiplatelet therapy before the TAVI procedure.
In 2019, transfemoral access was the default approach in all centers and it was used in 93.5% of the procedures. Proportions of the alternative routes are presented in Figure 5.
All TAVI teams adopted the Core Valve / EvolutR systems (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States). The SAPIEN XT/3 systems (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California, United States) were introduced in 17 out of 23 centers, Accurate Neo (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, United States) in 11, Portico (Abbott Vascular, Redwood City, California, United States) in 8, Lotus (Boston Scientific) in 6, and MyVal (Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Vapi, Gujarat, India) in a single center. The Hydra valve (Vascular Innovations, Nonthaburi, Thailand) and ALLEGRA bioprosthesis (New Valve Technology, Hechingen, Germany) were used within clinical trials in 1 and 2 centers, respectively. Before its discontinuation, Engager (Medtronic) was used in 10 centers.
During 11 years of TAVI activity, the most frequently used systems were Core Valve / EvolutR (57.7%), followed by SAPIEN XT/3 (27.1%) and Accurate (6.9%). In 2019, the proportions of TAVI systems used to treat AS were as follows: EvolutR (58.4%), SAPIEN 3 (20.9%), Accurate (11.4%), Portico (8.9%), and Lotus (0.4%) (Supplementary material, Table S2).
Periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis was routinely implemented in 20 (91%) centers, 17 (77%) used local anesthesia as a default approach, and 15 (68%) performed routine TAVI without the use of aortic balloon valvuloplasty.
Percutaneous closure devices were used for the transfemoral approach in 13 (59%) centers: all these teams used the ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure Systems (Abbott Vascular, Redwood City, California, United States), while a single center also used the Prostar XL Percutaneous Vascular Surgical System (Abbott Vascular). The Manta Vascular Closure Device (Teleflex, Morrisville, North Carolina, United States) was introduced in 3 centers in 2019.
Based on the PICTS reports from 2018, among all TAVI centers in Poland, 18 patients (1.43% of TAVI procedures) required urgent conversion to SAVR or surgical intervention due to complications during the index hospitalization. Among patients without evidence of new conduction system abnormalities, in 3 (13.5%) centers the operators removed the right ventricular electrode in the operating room, 10 (45.5%) teams left it for 24 hours, while in 9 (41%) centers, the operators maintained the electrode for 2 days after the procedure.
The antithrombotic regimens prescribed after TAVI varied between the centers: 2 of them (9%) recommended routine single antiplatelet therapy, 20 (91%) recommended DAPT, and none advised oral anticoagulant therapy in patients without other indications. In patients with atrial fibrillation, vitamin K antagonists or novel oral anticoagulants alone were prescribed in 4 (18%) centers, while a combination therapy with single antiplatelet therapy was used in the remaining 18 (81.8%). Continuation of DAPT for 3 months was recommended in 12 (54.5%) centers, for 6 months in 9 (41%) centers, and 1-year therapy was recommended in a single center (4.5%).
Structured follow-up of patients varied between the centers. A TAVI-oriented clinic has been established in a single hospital. Cardiology clinics were responsible for the follow-up in 8 (36.4%), cardiac surgery clinics in 5 (22.7%), while a hybrid scheme of follow-up in cardiac surgery and cardiology clinics was used in 9 (41%) centers.
Discussion
The PICTS analyzed trends in TAVI adoption and practice in Poland since its introduction in 2008 and summarized the experience of TAVI operators. The main findings of the report are outlined below. The number and distribution of the established TAVI centers allow for providing adequate treatment to patients with severe AS. Still, access to treatment remains limited by a yearly number of procedures reimbursed by the national health system. The annual TAVI volume has been increasing since its introduction, but the growth is still suboptimal given the number of patients meeting the clinical and anatomical profile of TAVI eligibility. The development of the Polish TAVI consensus recommendations set the framework for training, certification, and structure of the Heart Teams.3 Accordingly, an adequate number of operators have been trained and certified in the last decade. Centres differ in total TAVI volumes, and the median number of implants per year suggests that in low-volume sites repeated training may be needed to maintain the competence of the operators.
Over the last decade, the rapidly evolving technology transformed a complex transcatheter intervention into a standardized and streamlined procedure. Positive outcomes of clinical trials conducted in all risk groups of patients with severe AS sparked its popularity in developed countries. From the beginning, indications for TAVI have been progressively changing, extending from patients at prohibitive and high surgical risk to moderate- and low-risk individuals. The results of the first randomized trials in inoperable and high-risk patients provided solid evidence for the adoption of TAVI.11-13 Later studies confirmed that TAVI is not worse compared with surgery in the group of patients at intermediate risk, while the PARTNER III, NOTION, and Evolut Low-Risk trials, as well as a number of registries opened the door for transcatheter treatment of low-risk patients with AS.14-18 The ESC updated the guidelines for valve disease in 2017, assigning class I, level B evidence for TAVI treatment for the first time, even in patients at moderate risk if the Heart Team recognizes a contraindication to surgery.10 The above trials were conducted in the most active American and Western European centers which shared their encouraging experiences with other countries.
The rate of TAVI implementation in Europe varies between the countries, mostly depending on the levels of health spending and reimbursement opportunities. Intensive economic strategies and health policies developed to tackle the main causes of mortality allowed for a faster spread of TAVI to intermediate and low surgical risk groups.19 In 2017, the annual number of TAVI procedures in Germany reached almost 20 000 (n = 19 752), with the rate of 250 per 1 000 000 inhabitants.20,21 In 2015, the number of TAVI procedures in France represented one-third of all aortic valve replacements with an annual number of 6722 procedures, while in 2016 it exceeded 9100 to reach the SAVR volume with 137 implants per 1 000 000 inhabitants.22 The PICTS showed that the numbers of established TAVI centers and operators trained in Poland were sufficient to offer treatment for symptomatic AS patients, meeting the standards of Western European countries. Unfortunately, after a decade of their activity, the annual national rate of TAVI procedures was only 40 per 1 000 000 inhabitants. Based on the model proposed by Durko et al,9 the estimated annual number of all candidates for TAVI in Poland in 2019 was 8310, with effective penetration rate of 18.65%. Our forecast analysis predicted that without serious efforts to enhance the availability of TAVI, the situation would not improve in 5 years. A reduction in the access to treatment observed during the COVID-19 pandemic may further impact this ominous prognosis (Figure 3).
The following causes of the slow implementation of TAVI in Poland could be identified. First, the Polish health expenditure as a proportion of the gross domestic product is 6.7%, which is one of the lowest rates in the European region of the World Health Organization.23 The annual number of procedures per center is limited by contracts with the National Health Fund. Decreasing reimbursement for the intervention only allows for covering the cost of hardware, not reflecting the expenses for patient care or skilled workforce. Reimbursement for the screening of patients with AS does not balance expenditures for the clinical assessment, required imaging, or revascularization. Finally, strategies analyzing the cost-effectiveness of AS treatment are missing in Poland. The EAPCI introduced the Valve for Life Initiative in 2015, boosting the policies of the Polish Cardiac Society framed to tackle the limitations in the access to life-saving treatment of AS. The primary goal of this campaign is to promote knowledge about TAVI among the elderly population and healthcare professionals. The Valve for Life Initiative helps to create an environment for discussion on the optimal treatment selection for patients with severe AS.24,25
The reported distribution of patients based on their risk profile in Polish centers adheres to the current ESC recommendations to provide TAVI to patients at extreme-to-moderate surgical risk. Low acceptance rate of low-risk patients may result from the allocation of the limited resources to higher-risk groups. Multislice computed tomography is the imaging technique of choice for aortic valve and access route assessment in accordance with the European standards.26-28 Percutaneous coronary interventions are performed before TAVI in all centers, in keeping with the actual European recommendations for revascularization. The observed practice of performing PCI during TAVI (used in 3 centers) or postponing the procedure (adopted in 4 centers) may reflect the priority given to the treatment of AS and incomplete evidence for the management of coronary artery disease before TAVI.29,30 Similarly, limited use of antiplatelet therapy after TAVI and its combination with antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation may explain the existing variations in Polish practice.31,32
In 2019, almost one-third of the centers performed less than 50 procedures in total. Such a result reflects polarization in terms of the experience of the Polish Heart Teams. It also highlights the different levels of experience between the TAVI centers in Western Europe and in Poland. A national TAVI consensus was published in 2017 to stimulate unification of screening, procedural approach, and follow-up practice across the country. Although Poles represent 8.52% of the population of the European Union and 4 TAVI centers performed more than 500 procedures by the end of 2019, few controlled studies or large-scale registries of this field were conducted in our country.7,19,25,28,30 Stimulation of research activity may help to increase the quality and access to advanced AS therapy in Poland.
Interestingly, the survey observed a low reported rate of rescue conversion to SAVR or surgical treatment of in-hospital TAVI complications. With the growing safety profile of TAVI interventions, simplified and early discharge protocols could be proposed in high-volume centers to achieve the best clinical outcomes and to intensify their cost-effectiveness.
In summary, our study confirms the gap in access to life-saving therapies of AS in Poland. Despite the presence of certified TAVI centers, the adoption of this proven technology has been slow in the last decade, with 18% of TAVI-eligible patients having been treated in 2019. Intensive healthcare, economic, and scientific planning is needed to address the growing need for treatment of patients with severe AS. Cooperative efforts on a multinational level are warranted, which could be guided by cooperation with the EAPCI and survey extension to countries of Central and Eastern Europe.
Limitations
This was a voluntary observational study and the provided data were not audited locally. The numbers of procedures reported were not validated with registries of national health system administration in the years 2008 to 2013 due to the lack of such reports. Direct comparisons with TAVI adoption practices in countries of Central and Eastern Europe were not presented due to the absence of published reports.
Conclusions
The PICTS highlighted a slow increase in the number of TAVI procedures in Poland. When compared with reports from other European countries, our findings point to a large treatment gap in patients with severe AS, including those at high risk of SAVR. Efforts should be made to increase the availability of TAVI to populations considered eligible by the current evidence-based recommendations. In addition, remarkable regional variations in TAVI experience and practice exist among Polish TAVI centers.
Maciej Dąbrowski, MD, PhD, Department of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology, National Institute of Cardiology, ul. Alpejska 42, Warszawa, Poland, phone: +48 22 343 41 27, email: macidabro@gmail.com
November 16, 2020.
March 19, 2021.
March 19, 2021.
The authors would like to thank the leaders of the Polish TAVI Heart Teams for their help in providing datasets used in the PICTS study and their support given to the Valve for Life Initiative (Sławomir Dobrzycki, Paweł Kralisz, Marek Frank, Tomasz Hirnle; Medical University of Białystok; Paweł Buszman, Marcin Dębiński, Wojciech Domaradzki, Marek Cisowski; American Heart of Poland, Bielsko-Biała; Wojciech Pawliszak; Dr Antoni Jurasz Memorial University Hospital, Bydgoszcz; Robert Romanek, Maurycy Missima; 10th Military Research Hospital, Bydgoszcz; Dariusz Ciećwierz, Dariusz Jagielak; Medical University of Gdansk; Andrzej Ochała, Wojciech Wojakowski, Grzegorz Smolka, Radosław Parma, Marek Deja; Medical University of Silesia, Katowice; Dariusz Dudek, Jarosław Trębacz, Jacek Legutko, Paweł Kleczyński, Robert Sobczyński, Bogusław Kapelak; John Paul II Hospital, Institute of Cardiology, Kraków; Jarosław Wójcik, Andrzej Madejczyk, Janusz Stążka; Medical University of Lublin; Michał Kidawa, Jacek Jędrzejczyk, Tomasz Rudzinski, Bogdan Jegier, Andrzej Walczak, Michał Krejca; Medical University of Łódź; Grzegorz Religa, Zbigniew Peruga, Tomasz Kaszczyński; Bieganski Hospital; Medical University of Łódź; Wojciech Faron, Jarosław Hiczkiewicz, Ryszard Stanisławski; Nowa Sól Hospital; Jerzy Sacha, Jacek Kaperczak; Regional Medical Center, Opole; Maciej Lesiak, Marek Grygier, Aleksander Araszkiewicz, Marcin Misterski, Mateusz Puślecki, Anna Olasińska-Wiśniewska, Anna Komosa, Marek Jemielity; Poznan University of Medical Sciences; Piotr Olszówka, Kazimierz Widenka, Sławomir Żurek, Rafał Kurianowicz; 2nd District Hospital, Rzeszów; Jarosław Gorący, Maciej Lewandowski, Mirosław Brykczyński; Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin; Piotr Kwiatkowski, Sławomir Gołębiewski, Leszek Gryszko, Agata Bilewska, Ewa Surmacz, Beata Uziebło-Życzkowska; Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw; Robert Gil, Tomasz Pawłowski, Piotr Suwalski; Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, Warsaw; Janusz Kochman, Zenon Huczek, Radosław Wilimski; Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw; Adam Witkowski, Zbigniew Chmielak, Maciej Dąbrowski, Krzysztof Kuśmierski; National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw; Marcin Protasiewicz, Marek Jasiński; Wrocław Medical University; Krzysztof Reczuch, Piotr Kubler, Artur Telichowski, Marek Mak, Jacek Skiba; Clinical Military Hospital, Wrocław; Krzysztof Wilczek, Piotr Chodór, Michał Hawranek, Michał Zembala, Marian Zembala; Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze; Andrzej Kleinrok, Tomasz Smyk, Łukasz Tułecki; Pope John Paul II Hospital, Zamość)
All authors contributed to the study concept, design, and supervision. RP and MD conducted the study and analyzed and interpreted the data. All authors participated in drafting and revising the manuscript and approved its final version.
None declared.
Dąbrowski M, Parma R, Huczek Z, et al. The Polish Interventional Cardiology TAVI Survey (PICTS): 10 years of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Poland. The landscape after the first stage of the Valve for Life Initiative. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2021; 131; 413-420. doi:10.20452/pamw.15887
- 1.
- Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis. First Human Case Description. 2002; 106: 3006-3008.Crossref
- 2.
- Siontis GCM, Praz F, Pilgrim T, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2016; 14; 37: 3503-3512.Crossref
- 3.
- Parma R, Zembala MO, Dabrowski M, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Expert Consensus of the Association of Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society and the Polish Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgeons, approved by the Board of the Polish Cardiac Society. Kardiol Pol. 2017; 75: 937-964.Crossref
- 4.
- Mylotte D, Osnabrugge RL, Windecker S, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in Europe: adoption trends and factors influencing device utilization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62: 210-219.Crossref
- 5.
- Osnabrugge RL, Kappetein AP, Reynolds MR, et al. Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter valvular interventions: economic challenges. EuroIntervention. 2013; 9 (Suppl 3): S48-S54.Crossref
- 6.
- Di Mario C, Eltchaninoff H, Moat NE, et al; Transcatheter Valve Treatment Sentinel Registry (TCVT) Investigators of the EURObservational Research Programme (EORP) of the European Society of Cardiology. The 2011-12 pilot European Sentinel Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: in-hospital results in 4.571 patients. EuroIntervention. 2013; 8: 1362-1371.
- 7.
- Parma R, Dabrowski M, Ochala A, et al. The Polish Interventional Cardiology TAVI Survey (PICTS): adoption and practice of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Poland. Adv Interv Cardiol. 2017; 13: 10-17.Crossref
- 8.
- Valve for Life – Poland. European Society of Cardiology. https://www.escardio.org/Sub-specialty-communities/European-Association-of-Percutaneous-Cardiovascular-Interventions-(EAPCI)/Advocacy/valve-for-life-poland. Accessed December 2020.
- 9.
- Durko AP, Osnabrugge RL, Van Mieghem NM, et al. Annual number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation per country: current estimates and future projections. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39: 2635-2642.Crossref
- 10.
- Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38: 2739-2791.Crossref
- 11.
- Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 1597-1607.Crossref
- 12.
- Gleason TG, Reardon MJ, Popma JJ, et al. 5-Year outcomes of self-expanding transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72: 2687-2696.
- 13.
- Kapadia SR, Leon MB, Makkar RR, et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015; 385: 2485-2491.Crossref
- 14.
- Reardon MJ, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ, et al. Surgical or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376: 1321-1331.
- 15.
- Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 1609-1620.
- 16.
- Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380: 1695-1705.Crossref
- 17.
- Thyregod HGH, Ihlemann N, Jorgensen TH, et al. Five-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes from the Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention (NOTION) Randomized Clinical Trial in lower surgical risk patients. Circulation. 2019; 139: 2714-2723.Crossref
- 18.
- Popma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380: 1706-1715.Crossref
- 19.
- Barbato E, Noc M, Baumbach A, et al. Mapping interventional cardiology in Europe: the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) Atlas Project. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41: 2579-2588.Crossref
- 20.
- Eggebrecht H, Bestehorn M, Haude M, et al. Outcomes of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery department: insights from the prospective German aortic valve replacement quality assurance registry (AQUA) in 17 919 patients. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37: 2240-2248.Crossref
- 21.
- Eggebrecht H, Mehta RH. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in Germany: more than 100.000 procedures and now the standard of care for the elderly. EuroIntervention. 2019; 14: e1549-e1552.Crossref
- 22.
- Biagioni C, Tirado G, Rodés-Cabau J, et al. State of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in spain versus europe and non-European countries. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018; 30: 301-309.
- 23.
- Sowada C, Sagan A, Kowalska-Bobko I, et al. Poland: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2019; 21: 1-234.
- 24.
- Windecker S, Haude M, Baumbach A. Introducing a new EAPCI programme: the Valve for Life initiative. EuroIntervention. 2016; 11: 977-979.Crossref
- 25.
- Dudek D, Barbato E, Baumbach A, et al. Current trends in structural heart interventions: an overview of the EAPCI registries. EuroIntervention. 2017; 13: Z11-Z13.Crossref
- 26.
- Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, et al. SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) / transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012; 6: 366-380.Crossref
- 27.
- Blanke P, Weir-Mccall JR, Achenbach S, et al. Computed tomography imaging in the context of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) / transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): an expert consensus document of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 12: 1-24.Crossref
- 28.
- Kochman J, Kołtowski Ł, Huczek Z, et al. Complete percutaneous approach versus surgical access in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from a multicentre registry. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76: 202-208.Crossref
- 29.
- Danson E, Hansen P, Sen S, et al. Assessment, treatment, and prognostic implications of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016; 13: 276-285.Crossref
- 30.
- Huczek Z, Zbronski K, Grodecki K, et al. Concomitant coronary artery disease and its management in patients referred to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from the POL-TAVI Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 91: 115-123.Crossref
- 31.
- Rodes-Cabau J, Masson JB, Welsh RC, et al. Aspirin versus aspirin plus clopidogrel as antithrombotic treatment following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve: the ARTE (Aspirin Versus Aspirin + Clopidogrel Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) randomized clinical trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10: 1357-1365.Crossref
- 32.
- Abdul-Jawad Altisent O, Durand E, Munoz-Garcia AJ, et al. Warfarin and antiplatelet therapy versus warfarin alone for treating patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9: 1706-1717.Crossref