logo
Original articles

Prevalence of hypercholesterolemia in the elderly and very elderly members of the Polish population: results of a national cross‑sectional representative survey

Krzysztof Chlebus1ORCID, Tomasz Zdrojewski2, Kacper Jagiełło2, Małgorzata Mossakowska3, Jerzy Chudek4, Andrzej Więcek5, Tomasz Grodzicki6
1 First Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
2 Department of Preventive Medicine and Education, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
3 Study on Aging and Longevity, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Warszawa, Poland
4 Department of Internal Medicine and Oncological Chemotherapy, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
5 Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
6 Department of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
DOI: 10.20452/pamw.16882
Published online: November 6, 2024.
Key words: elderly, hypercholesterolemia, lipid disorders, prevalence
CCBYNCSACC BY-NC-SA 4.0

In this article
Abstract

Introduction: Lipid disorders are the most common cardiovascular risk factor among the adult population in Poland. However, epidemiological data on the ever‑growing group of older adults remain insufficient.

Objectives: Our aim was to describe and analyze the epidemiology of lipid disorders among Polish seniors.

Patients and methods: A random sample of 4101 participants (2136 men; 1965 women) aged 65 to 104 years, evenly distributed across age subgroups (65–69, 70–74, 75–79, 80–84, 85–89, and ≥90 years), was included in the cross‑sectional, national PolSenior survey. Anthropometric measurements, blood pressure values, and blood samples for lipid profile testing were obtained.

Results: Hypercholesterolemia was present in 62.4% of Polish seniors (56.1% of men; 66.3% of women). The highest mean (95% CI) total cholesterol (TC) levels were observed in those aged 65–69 years: 206 (201–210.9) mg/dl in men and 220.6 (215.6–225.6) mg/dl in women. Women had higher TC levels than men across all age groups. Mean (95% CI) low‑density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‑C) levels followed a similar trend: in women, they decreased from 131.6 (127.2–136.1) mg/dl in the age group of 65–69 years to 120.1 (115.2–125) mg/dl in those aged 90 years or above. In men, LDL‑C values declined from 121.6 (117.3–125.9) mg/dl to 106.5 (102.5–110.5) mg/dl over the same age span. LDL‑C concentrations were higher in women across all age categories.

Conclusions: In the elderly Polish population, mean serum TC and LDL‑C concentrations are consistently higher in women than in men. The findings emphasize the significance of lipid disorders as a cardiovascular risk factor in older adults in Poland.

What's new?

This study is the first in Poland to comprehensively analyze and describe lipid disorders among older adults aged 65 and above. It provides detailed epidemiological data on key lipid fractions across distinct age groups of seniors, highlighting significant sex- and age‑related differences. The work also explores the relationships between hypercholesterolemia and other cardiovascular risk factors. These novel observations emphasize the importance of addressing lipid disorders in the elderly population to improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Introduction

According to the World Health Organization, cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for nearly 31% of all deaths worldwide, making it the leading cause of death. Each year, CVD kills more people than any other disease, a statistic that has remained consistent for nearly a decade.1

Despite significant progress in preventing premature mortality, CVD remains the leading cause of death in Poland. In 2013, data from the Polish Central Statistical Office showed that CVD was responsible for approximately 46% of all deaths in the general population and 53.1% among individuals over 65 years old.2 By comparison, the average CVD‑related mortality rate in the European Union stands at 40%.3

To understand the morbidity and mortality associated with CVD, it is necessary to assess the distribution of its key risk factors. Well‑established contributors, such as hypertension, lipid disorders, abdominal obesity, diabetes, and smoking are the main causes of CVD in adult populations.4 The prevalence of these risk factors increases with age, and their combination significantly accelerates atherosclerosis, leading to a logarithmic growth in CVD risk.

Total cholesterol (TC) level is an independent predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) in men over 65 years old.5 A study by Benfante et al,5 involving 1480 men over 65 years of age, demonstrated a progressive increase in CHD risk with rising TC levels. Furthermore, a meta‑analysis by the Prospective Studies Collaboration6 showed that reducing TC concentration by 1 mmol/l decreased CHD‑related mortality by one‑sixth in those aged 70 to 89 years, irrespective of sex.

The relationship between cardiovascular risk and individual risk factors in adults is well‑documented in the literature. However, understanding these dynamics in older adult populations is equally critical. This paper presents the data on the prevalence of lipid disorders among older adults in the Polish population, a representative cohort of Central and Eastern Europe, which is characterized by some of the highest CVD mortality rates in the world.7,8

Patients and methods

The design, inclusion criteria, examination procedures, and study cohort structure for the PolSenior survey have been described in detail elsewhere.9 Briefly, the PolSenior survey was a cross‑sectional study aimed at assessing the prevalence of major medical, psychological, and socioeconomic issues in a representative group of older adults in Poland. Participants were selected using a 3‑stage stratified proportional draw.9 The overall response rate for the survey was 43%. The study included 4101 respondents (2136 men and 1965 women) who provided blood samples for lipid measurements. The sample was divided into 6 equally sized age groups: 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, 80–84, 85–89, and ≥90 years.

Data collection for the PolSenior survey took place between 2008 and 2009. The participants underwent examinations during 3 separate home visits conducted by well‑trained nurses. These visits included completing questionnaires, measuring blood pressure (BP), performing anthropometric assessment (described in detail elsewhere9), and collecting blood and urine samples. The methodology for BP measurements is outlined in a dedicated publication.10

Hypertension was diagnosed according to the 2018 European Society of Hypertension / European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.11 This included cases where the average systolic and diastolic BP values from 2 measurements during each visit were equal or higher than 140 mm Hg and / or 90 mm Hg, respectively, or if the patient had been using antihypertensive medication within the past 2 weeks due to a prior hypertension diagnosis.

Overweight was defined as body mass index (BMI) of 25 to 29.9 kg/m2, while obesity was classified as BMI of at least 30 kg/m2. Visceral obesity was defined as a waist circumference of at least 80 cm in women and at least 94 cm in men.

Blood samples were collected at participants’ homes following 10 to 12 hours of fasting. Serum was separated and frozen at a local laboratory within 2 hours of collection. Serum TC, high‑density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‑C), and triglyceride concentrations were measured using a Modular PPE Analyzer (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany).

Serum TC concentrations were determined using an enzymatic method with cholesterol esterase and cholesterol oxidase. HDL‑C levels were measured using accelerator selective detergent, which facilitates accelerated non–HDL‑C oxidation and HDL‑C dissolving. The concentrations of low‑density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‑C) were calculated using the Friedewald formula: LDL‑C [mg/dl] = TC [mg/dl] – HDL‑C [mg/dl] – triglycerides [mg/dl]/5. This formula was not applied for triglyceride concentrations exceeding 400 mg/dl. Triglyceride concentrations were determined by an enzymatic method using glycerol kinase and glycerol‑3‑phosphate oxidase.

Hypercholesterolemia was defined as either TC concentrations greater than 190 mg/dl (>5 mmol/l) or the use of statins or fibrates. Elevated LDL‑C was diagnosed for concentrations equal to or greater than 115 mg/dl (≥3 mmol/l). Abnormal serum HDL‑C levels were defined as less than 45 mg/dl (<⁠1.2 mmol/l) in women and less than 40 mg/dl (<⁠1 mmol/l) in men, excluding those on statin therapy. Triglyceride concentrations were considered elevated if equal to or greater than 150 mg/dl (≥1.7 mmol/l). The criteria for diagnosing abnormal lipid and lipoprotein concentrations are in line with the 2016 European Society of Cardiology / European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias.12

To address additional study objectives, a questionnaire survey was conducted, recording responses related to hypercholesterolemia awareness and the use of statins or fibrates in the preceding 2 weeks. The questionnaire also collected demographic and socioeconomic data, including the level of education, occupation, place of residence, and economic status.

For analyses utilizing multivariable logistic regression models, diabetes diagnosis was defined as a prior diagnosis and / or the use of glucose‑lowering therapy. The study protocol was approved by the Bioethics Committee at the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland (KNW‑6501‑38/I/08). All participants provided written consent.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were summarized as means (95% CI), means (SD), or medians (interquartile range), with normality assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Categorical variables were expressed as percentages (95% CI). Data on lipid prevalence, treatment, and control were analyzed in 5‑year age groups, separately for men and women, in line with the selection of the study population. These age‑group results were not weighted for the lipid profile in the elderly Poles. However, results for the entire elderly population of the elderly Polish adults or for age groups larger than 5 years have been weighted to account for the respondent’s age, sex, and place of residence to reflect the structure of the population.

Comparisons of means between men and women were conducted using the t test with an independent variance estimation verified by the Levene test. Proportional comparisons were performed using the χ2 test. Differences in TC and LDL‑C levels across 5‑year age groups were analyzed using the univariable analysis of variance. The Mann–Whitney test was used for sex differences and the Kruskal–Wallis test for age groups in the triglycerides level analysis. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to assess the effect of established cardiovascular risk factors—such as smoking, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension—on hypercholesterolemia prevalence, stratified by sex. Subgroup analyses by age were not weighted. For all 2‑tailed analyses, a P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. The calculations were performed using STATISTICA version 10 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States).

Results

Baseline characteristics

The PolSenior study enrolled a nationally representative random sample of 4979 eligible participants from Poland, all aged 65 years or older (age range, 65–104 years). Blood samples were collected from 4101 of these participants.

The mean (SD) age of the study population was 73.8 (6.5) years, with the crude mean (SD) age of 79.3 (8.7) years. The sample included 2136 men (52%) and 1965 women (48%). The crude mean (SD) age was 79.4 (8.5) for men and 79.2 (8.8) years for women (P = 0.28).

The distribution of participants across the 6 age subgroups (65–69, 70–74, 75–79, 80–84, 85–89, and ≥90 years) was as follows: 331, 404, 379, 345, 392, and 285 men, and 361, 385, 331, 291, 306, and 291 women, respectively. Sociodemographic characteristics by sex have been presented elsewhere.9

Among the entire cohort, 24.3% of the participants were treated with statins. In the 65–79 years age group, statin use was the highest, at 28.7%, while among those aged 80 years or older, the prevalence was 19.3%.

The distribution of major cardiovascular risk factors in the weighted representative sample, adjusted to reflect the demographic structure of elderly individuals in Poland, is presented in Table 1. Men were 3‑fold more likely to smoke than women, both at the time of the study and in the past. Conversely, women exhibited higher rates of obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2), abdominal obesity, hypertension, and diabetes (by medical history and / or glucose‑lowering therapy).

Table 1. Prevalence of smoking, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes in the PolSenior survey participants
Cardiovascular risk factors
Women
Men
Data are weighted for age, sex, and place of residence, and are presented as percentage (95% CI).
a Result is significant for men vs women (P <⁠0.05).
b Defined as a history of diabetes or / and glucose‑lowering therapy
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index
Smokinga
Current smoker
6.3 (5.4–7.3)
19.3 (17.4–21.4)
Past smoker
17.9 (16.4–19.4)
52.7 (50.3–55.2)
Never smoker
75.8 (74.1–77.4)
27.9 (25.7–30.2)
BMIa, kg/m2
<⁠25
19.1 (17.6–20.7)
24.3 (22.2–26.5)
25–29.9
37.5 (35.6–39.4)
44.4 (41.9–46.9)
≥30
43.5 (41.5–45.4)
31.4 (29.1–33.7)
Abdominal obesitya, waist circumference
Women ≥88 cm / Men ≥102 cm
77.6 (75.9–79.2)
50.9 (48.4–53.4)
Women ≥80 cm / Men ≥94 cm
91.8 (90.6–92.8)
77.6 (75.4–79.6)
Hypertensiona
80.3 (78.7–81.8)
75.2 (73–77.3)
Diabetesa,b
20.9 (19.4–22.5)
16.6 (14.8–18.5)

Details on the population characteristics regarding marital status, level of education, and place of residence are presented in Supplementary material, Table S1.

Overview of the lipid parameters

In all age groups, women had higher serum TC levels than men (Table 2). While TC values decreased with age for both sexes, the difference between men and women was more pronounced among the very old than in the participants under 75 years of age.

Table 2. Serum levels of total cholesterol, low‑density lipoprotein cholesterol, high‑density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides in the PolSenior survey participants
Age group, y
Women (n = 1965)
Men (n = 2136)
Data are not weighted and are presented as means (95% CI) unless otherwise indicated.
SI conversion factors: to convert TC, LDL‑C, and HDL‑C to mmol/l, multiply by 0.0259; triglycerides to mmol/l, by 0.0113.
a Result is significant for men vs women (P <⁠0.05).
b The results for LDL‑C were calculated using the Friedewald formula only when the triglyceride concentration was <⁠400 mg/dl (<⁠4.5 mmol/l).
c The triglyceride distribution is not normal, median (IQR) analysis was used. The Mann–Whitney test was used for sex differences and the Kruskal–Wallis test for age groups.
Abbreviations: HDL‑C, high‑density lipoprotein cholesterol; IQR, interquartile range; LDL‑C, low‑density lipoprotein cholesterol
TC, mg/dl
65–69
220.6 (215.6–225.6)
206 (201–210.9)a
70–74
211.2 (206.7–215.8)
201.1 (196.8–205.3)a
75–79
209.7 (204.6–214.8)
193.9 (189.4–198.4)a
80–84
210.3 (204.5–216.1)
189.2 (184.4–194)a
85–89
206.2 (200.8–211.6)
183.7 (179.5–187.9)a
≥90
202.4 (196.8–208.1)
179.7 (175–184.5)a
HDL‑C, mg/dl
65–69
54.1 (52.7–55.5)
48.6 (47–50.2)a
70–74
54.8 (53.3–56.2)
48.7 (47.4–49.9)a
75–79
51.9 (50.5–53.3)
47.5 (46.2–48.8)a
80–84
52.6 (50.9–54.3)
47.9 (46.6–49.3)a
85–89
51.9 (50.3–53.5)
48 (46.7–49.3)a
≥90
51.4 (49.7–53.1)
48.5 (46.9–50.1)
LDL‑Cb, mg/dl
65–69
131.6 (127.2–136.1)
121.6 (117.3–125.9)a
70–74
123.3 (119.2–127.3)
121.8 (118–125.7)
75–79
122.8 (118.3–127.2)
117 (113.1–120.8)
80–84
124.5 (119.8–129.2)
112.4 (108.4–116.5)a
85–89
121.7 (117.2–126.2)
108.7 (105.1–112.3)a
≥90
120.1 (115.2–125)
106.5 (102.5–110.5)a
Triglyceridesc, mg/dl, median (IQR)
65–69
127.5 (120.7–134.3)
118.7 (112.5–129.3)a
70–74
123.2 (115.8–129.6)
109.3 (104.1–120.3)a
75–79
128.4 (123.1–138)
104.8 (99.4–111)a
80–84
117.9 (111.2–126.3)
107.9 (101.2–112.4)
85–89
117.3 (111.9–124.1)
99.6 (95.1–103.4)a
≥90
110 (104–115.7)
89.7 (85.1–95)a

Serum LDL‑C levels showed a similar distribution, except in the 70–74 years and 75–79 years age groups, where no difference was observed. In all older age categories, LDL‑C levels were higher in women than in men.

Serum HDL‑C levels were consistently higher in women than in men across all age groups. Triglyceride levels decreased with age in both sexes; however, they were higher in women than in men aged 75–79 and over 85 years of age.

Distribution of serum total cholesterol

The largest proportion of seniors had serum TC levels in the range of 190–239 mg/dl, comprising 39.9% of the total study population. When analyzed by sex, 39.2% of men and 40.4% of women fell within this range. Notably, serum TC levels exceeding 310 mg/dl were observed in 1% of men and 2.7% of women.

The percentage of hypercholesterolemia, defined as TC greater than 190 mg/dl or the use of statin therapy, decreased progressively with age: 66.8% in the 65–69 years age group, 61.3% in the 70–74, 58.1% in 75–79, 55.2% in 80–84, and 49.9% in both the 85–89 and ≥90 years age groups (Table 3).

Table 3. Serum total cholesterol levels in the PolSenior survey participants
Stratification
Total cholesterol, mg/dl
<⁠175
175–189
190–239
240–309
≥310
Data are not weighted and presented as percentage (95% CI).
a Result is significant for age and men vs women (P <⁠0.05).
SI conversion factors: see Table 2
Abbreviations: see Tables 1 and 2
By age, ya
65–69
20.9 (18–24.2)
12.2 (9.9–14.9)
39.1 (35.5–42.9)
24.4 (21.3–27.8)
3.3 (2.2–5)
70–74
25.2 (22.2–28.4)
13.4 (11.2–16.1)
40.7 (37.3–44.3)
18.9 (16.3–21.9)
1.7 (0.9–2.9)
75–79
27.8 (24.6–31.3)
14.1 (11.6–16.9)
39.9 (36.3–43.6)
17.1 (14.4–20.1)
1.1 (0.5–2.3)
80–84
31.3 (27.8–35.1)
13.4 (10.9–16.4)
39.4 (35.6–43.3)
13.4 (10.9–16.4)
2.4 (1.4–4)
85–89
37.7 (34.1–41.4)
12.4 (10.1–15.2)
34.2 (30.7–37.9)
14.6 (12.1–17.5)
1.1 (0.5–2.4)
≥90
39.9 (35.8–44)
11.1 (8.7–14.1)
33.9 (30–37.9)
13.9 (11.2–17.1)
1.2 (0.5–2.6)
By sexa
Men
35.9 (33.8–37.9)
14.4 (13–16)
35.7 (33.7–37.8)
13 (11.6–14.5)
1 (0.6–1.5)
Women
23.8 (21.9–25.7)
11.1 (9.8–12.6)
40.6 (38.4–42.8)
21.9 (20.1–23.8)
2.7 (2.1–3.6)
By BMI, kg/m2
<⁠25
28.5 (25.8–31.4)
12.2 (10.3–14.4)
39.9 (36.9–43)
17.9 (15.7–20.4)
1.4 (0.8–2.4)
25−29.9
29.3 (27.1–31.6)
13.3 (11.6–15.1)
37.1 (34.7–39.5)
18.6 (16.7–20.6)
1.8 (1.2–2.6)
≥30
30.6 (28.1–33.3)
13 (11.2–15.1)
37.8 (35.1–40.6)
16.1 (14.1–18.3)
2.4 (1.7–3.5)
By level of education
Primary – uncompleted
32.5 (28.5–36.7)
10.6 (8.1–13.6)
39 (34.9–43.4)
15.2 (12.3–18.6)
2.7 (1.5–4.6)
Primary or professional training
28.1 (26.3–30)
12.5 (11.2–13.9)
39.2 (37.2–41.2)
18.1 (16.6–19.8)
2 (1.5–2.7)
Secondary
30.9 (27.8–34.2)
14.1 (11.8–16.7)
36.6 (33.3–40)
17.6 (15.1–20.4)
0.8 (0.4–1.8)
Higher
37.6 (32.5–43)
14.9 (11.4–19.2)
32.6 (27.8–37.9)
13.4 (10.1–17.6)
1.5 (0.5–3.6)
By place of residence
Rural areas
29.5 (27.3–31.8)
11.3 (9.8–12.9)
39.5 (37.2–42)
17.4 (15.6–19.3)
2.3 (1.7–3.2)
City <⁠50 000 residents
29.2 (26.5–32.1)
13.7 (11.7–15.9)
35.9 (33–38.9)
19.8 (17.4–22.3)
1.4 (0.8–2.4)
City 50 000–200 000 residents
30.3 (26.6–34.3)
12.4 (9.9–15.5)
39.7 (35.7–43.9)
15.4 (12.6–18.7)
2.1 (1.2–3.8)
City >200 000 residents
32.2 (29–35.5)
15.3 (12.9–18)
36.5 (33.2–40)
14.9 (12.6–17.6)
1.1 (0.6–2.2)

Conversely, the percentage of individuals with serum TC concentrations below 175 mg/dl nearly doubled, rising from 20.9% in the 65–69 years age group to 39.9% among those aged 90 years or older. The percentage of people with TC of 310 mg/dl or greater was similar in all age groups, including the oldest participants.

A higher percentage of men (35.9%) than women (23.8%) had a TC concentration below 175 mg/dl. The percentage of respondents with TC levels exceeding 310 mg/dl was nearly 3‑fold higher in women (2.7%) than in men (1%).

BMI did not affect the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia, with similar rates observed across BMI categories: 59.2% for BMI below 25 kg/m2, 57.5% for BMI from 25 to 29.9 kg/m2, and 56.3% for BMI greater than 30 kg/m2. Likewise, no differences in the distribution of TC concentrations were found between BMI groups. Furthermore, educational level and place of residence did not appear to impact TC concentrations.

Prevalence of hypercholesterolemia

The prevalence of hypercholesterolemia was higher in women than in men across all age groups over 70 years (Table 4). The highest prevalence of hypercholesterolemia among women was observed in the 70–74 years age group, while in men, it was most common in the 65–69 years age group. With age, the percentage decreased in both sexes, reaching its lowest in the oldest participants: 64.9% among women and 47.8% among men.

Table 4. Prevalence of hypercholesterolemia in the PolSenior survey participants
Age group, y
Women
Men
Data are not weighted and presented as percentage (95% CI).
a Result is significant for men vs women (P <⁠0.05).
65–69
84.8 (80.6–88.3)
77.4 (72.5–81.8)
70–74
86.5 (82.5–89.7)
74.4 (69.8–78.6)a
75–79
85.2 (80.7–88.8)
73.4 (68.5–77.8)a
80–84
85.8 (81.1–89.5)
66.3 (60.9–71.3)a
85–89
76.9 (71.7–81.5)
58.9 (53.8–63.8)a
≥90
64.9 (59–70.4)
47.8 (41.9–53.9)a

Prevalence of lipid disorders

In the Polish elderly population, TC concentrations of 190 mg/dl or greater were observed in 62.4% of individuals, with a higher prevalence among women than men (66.3% vs 56.1%, weighted for the population structure; Table 5).

Table 5. Total cholesterol intervals in the PolSenior survey participants
Group
Total cholesterol, mg/dl
<⁠175
175–189
190
Data are weighted for the structure of the adult population aged 65 years and older in Poland and are presented as percentage (95% CI). P <⁠0.001 for men, for women, and for men vs women.
SI conversion factors: see Table 2
All
24.7 (23.4–26)
12.9 (11.9–13.9)
62.4 (61–63.9)
Men
29.7 (27.5–32)
14.2 (12.5–16)
56.1 (53.7–58.6)
Women
21.6 (20–23.2)
12.1 (10.9–13.4)
66.3 (64.5–68.2)

Serum concentrations of LDL‑C of 115 mg/dl or greater were found in 55.6% of older Poles (men, 52.5%; women, 57.4%) and serum concentrations of LDL‑C below 70 mg/dl were present in only 8% of the participants (men, 9.6%; women 7.1%; Table 6)

Table 6. Low‑density lipoprotein cholesterol intervals in the PolSenior survey participants
Group
LDL‑C, mg/dl
<⁠70
70–99
100–114
115–154
155–189
≥190
Data are weighted for the structure of the adult population aged 65 years and older in Poland and are presented as percentage (95% CI). P <⁠0.001 for men, for women, and for men vs women
SI conversion factors: see Table 2
Abbreviations: see Table 2
All
8 (7.2–8.9)
22 (20.8–23.3)
14.4 (13.4–15.5)
34.3 (32.9–35.8)
15.6 (14.5–16.7)
5.6 (4.9–6.4)
Men
9.6 (8.2–11.2)
22.4 (20.4–24.6)
15.5 (13.8–17.4)
35.4 (33–37.8)
12.7 (11.1–14.5)
4.4 (3.5–5.5)
Women
7.1 (6.1–8.2)
21.8 (20.2–23.4)
13.7 (12.4–15.1)
33.7 (31.9–35.6)
17.4 (15.9–18.9)
6.4 (5.5–7.4)

Low serum HDL‑C concentrations (<⁠40 mg/dl) were observed in 20.1% of the elderly population, with men showing this abnormality twice as often as women (28.6% vs 14.8%; Supplementary material, Table S2).

Elevated serum triglyceride concentrations (≥150 mg/dl) were reported in 29.9% of the seniors (95% CI, 28.5–31.3); with a higher prevalence among women (32%; 95% CI, 30.2–33.8), as compared with men (26.6%; 95% CI, 24.5–28.9; Table 7).

Table 7. Triglycerides intervals in the PolSenior survey participants
Group
Triglycerides, mg/dl
<⁠150
≥150
Data are weighted for the structure of the adult population aged 65 years and older in Poland and are presented as percentage (95% CI). P <⁠0.001 for men, for women, and for men vs women
SI conversion factors: see Table 2
All
70.1 (68.7–71.5)
29.9 (28.5–31.3)
Men
73.4 (71.1–75.5)
26.6 (24.5–28.9)
Women
68 (66.2–69.8)
32 (30.2–33.8)

Lipid parameters after adjusting for the age structure

After standardization to the age structure of the population, the most common serum LDL‑C concentrations were in the range of 115 to 154 mg/dl. Over one‑third of Polish seniors fell within this range, both in the whole study population and when analyzed by sex (Table 6).

For serum HDL‑C levels, the most frequent values in the senior population were 50 to 59 mg/dl, observed in 25.8% of the cohort. However, there were notable differences between sexes: among men, the most common HDL‑C levels were less than 40 mg/dl (28.6%), while among women, the highest serum concentrations of HDL‑C (>60 mg/dl) were most prevalent (28.7%; Supplementary material, Table S2).

Regarding triglycerides, 70.1% of Polish seniors had triglyceride levels below 150 mg/dl, with slightly more men than women in this category (73.4% vs 68%; Table 7).

Relationship between hypercholesterolemia and other cardiovascular disease risk factors

In multivariable logistic regression models, men aged 90 years and older were less likely to have hypercholesterolemia than those aged 70 years or younger, with an odds ratio of 0.27 (95% CI, 0.18–0.39), indicating a 73% reduction in likelihood. A comparable pattern emerged in women, but was restricted to those aged 85 years and older. Hypertension was associated with a higher prevalence of hypercholesterolemia in both men and women, whereas diabetes showed the opposite effect, correlating with a lower prevalence in both sexes (Table 8).

Table 8. Multivariable and univariable logistic regression models for hypercholesterolemia prevalence in the PolSenior survey participants
Group
Multivariable analysis
Univariable analysis
Men
Women
Men
Women
Data are presented as odds ratio (95% CI).
a P <⁠0.05
Abbreviations: ref, reference; others, see Table 1
Age, y
65–69
ref
ref
ref
ref
70–74
1.15 (0.76–1.75)
0.83 (0.58–1.18)
1.12 (0.75–1.69)
0.89 (0.63–1.25)
75–79
1.1 (0.71–1.7)
0.78 (0.55–1.12)
1.09 (0.72–1.66)
0.82 (0.58–1.16)
80–84
1.03 (0.66–1.59)
0.55 (0.38–0.78)a
1.08 (0.7–1.67)
0.62 (0.44–0.87)a
85–89
0.59 (0.39–0.89)a
0.42 (0.3–0.59)a
0.60 (0.4–0.89)a
0.42 (0.31–0.59)a
≥90
0.36 (0.24–0.54)a
0.27 (0.18–0.39)a
0.35 (0.24–0.5)a
0.29 (0.2–0.41)a
Smoking status
No
ref
ref
ref
ref
Yes
1.40 (0.67–2.87)
0.70 (0.53–0.93)a
1.86 (0.92–3.74)
0.93 (0.71–1.2)
BMI ≥30 kg/m2
No
ref
ref
ref
ref
Yes
0.9 (0.69–1.17)
1.21 (0.95–1.54)
1.05 (0.82–1.33)
1.47 (1.18–1.84)a
Hypertension
No
ref
ref
ref
ref
Yes
1.18 (0.88–1.6)
1.44 (1.17–1.77)a
1.27 (0.97–1.66)
1.64 (1.35–1.99)a
Diabetes
No
ref
ref
ref
ref
Yes
0.69 (0.51–0.92)a
0.75 (0.57–0.98)a
0.78 (0.6–1.01)
1 (0.78–1.28)

In multivariable regression analysis, smoking was associated with reduced odds of hypercholesterolemia in men, although this association was not evident in univariable analysis. Similarly, while univariable regression analysis indicated that BMI greater than 30 kg/m2 increased the risk of hypercholesterolemia in men, this relationship was no longer significant in multivariable analysis.

Arterial hypertension consistently increased the risk of hypercholesterolemia in men, with this effect observed in both univariable and multivariable analyses. Interestingly, diabetes reduced the odds of hypercholesterolemia in both women and men in multivariable regression; however, this association was not present in univariable analysis.

The sociodemographic characteristics of participants in the PolSenior survey as well as the percentage of participant categorized by LDL‑C, HDL‑C, and triglyceride intervals, and non–HDL‑C and TC / HDL‑C ratios are presented in Supplementary material, Tables S1–S6.

Discussion

This study shows the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia in the population of individuals aged 65 years and older, categorized into 6 age groups (65–69,70–74, 75–79, 80–84, 85–89, and ≥90 years). To the best of our knowledge, the PolSenior survey is the first large‑scale, population‑based study in Central and Eastern Europe that provides detailed insight into the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia across the older population, including those aged 90 years and older.

Despite the growing body of research on lipid disorders, data specific to seniors remain relatively limited compared with younger populations, posing challenges in developing evidence‑based recommendations, particularly for primary prevention in this demographic.13

The mean serum TC concentration in women increased in all age groups, whereas in men aged over 80 years, these levels were within the reference range (Table 2). In both sexes, TC levels showed a steady decline from the youngest to the oldest age. Notably, in each age category, women exhibited higher mean TC levels than men (Table 2). This discrepancy in TC levels may partially contribute to the earlier excess mortality in men, typically occurring before the age of 65 years.

The Dubbo study,14 conducted on a cohort of 1237 elderly individuals in Australia (divided into 3 age groups: 60–69, 70–79, and ≥80 years), similarly showed higher concentrations of cholesterol in women compared with men, with levels declining with age, particularly among men.

When comparing absolute values, the Polish population over 80 years old demonstrated significantly lower mean TC values than the Australian cohort—approximately 30 mg/dl lower in men and 40 mg/dl lower in women. Trends in serum LDL‑C levels mirrored those of TC, showing a general decline with advancing age, with mean LDL‑C levels consistently lower in men, as compared with women.

Comparable findings were reported in the Framingham Study over a 30‑year follow‑up,15 where cholesterol values in women were markedly higher than in men, a trend apparent in populations over 50 years old. In both sexes, TC and LDL‑C concentrations decreased in individuals over 65 years of age.

It is important to note that serum LDL‑C levels calculated using the Friedewald formula may underrepresent actual concentrations. Balder et al16 observed that LDL‑C levels measured directly were 7 mg/dl higher in men and 6 mg/dl higher in women, as compared with values calculated using the Friedwald formula.

In our study, HDL‑C levels tended to remain stable across age groups in men, while in women a minor decline with age was observed. However, the difference in mean HDL‑C values between sexes persisted. Comparable results were seen in the Australian population studied in the Dubbo cohort. In contrast, data from the Framingham cohort revealed that HDL‑C levels remained constant until the advanced age in both sexes.12

In the Irish population, sex‑related differences in lipid profiles emerged before the age of 20 years and persisted throughout life.17 In both sexes, TC and LDL‑C levels increased until middle age, then gradually decreased toward old age. The concentrations were higher in men than in women up to middle age, after which the trend was reversed, with women showing higher concentrations.

Median triglyceride values showed similar age- and sex‑related distribution to TC, increasing with age until middle age and then declining, though the distribution showed a marked positive skew, particularly among middle‑aged men. The levels of HDL‑C, in contrast, remained relatively stable throughout life, with men having lower levels than women.17

Balder et al16 in their analysis of the Dutch population, observed a gradual decrease in serum LDL‑C concentrations in men with age, consistent with trends noted in our study. However, the pattern in women was less definitive, with no clear trend for LDL‑C levels decreasing with age.

The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the probability of hypercholesterolemia decreases with age among men, with a similar trend observed in women, but only among the oldest age groups. The interpretation of this pattern poses a challenge and is not well‑supported by the current literature.

One possible explanation could be the higher cardiovascular risk in men, which may lead to earlier mortality among those with hypercholesterolemia, effectively “selecting out” individuals with higher lipid levels from the older male population. For women, the delayed onset of this trend might reflect their comparatively lower cardiovascular risk at younger ages, allowing the survival of individuals with hypercholesterolemia into older age.

The fact that hypercholesterolemia is less likely to be diagnosed in both sexes in the presence of diabetes and in men who are smokers can be interpreted in a similar way. A review of the literature revealed no reports on this phenomenon, highlighting the need for further in‑depth research.

Limitations

We acknowledge several limitations of our study. First, the response rate in the PolSenior study was 42.58%, which introduces potential selection bias. Additionally, not all patients consented to laboratory tests, reducing the sample size to 4101 participants. Second, the diagnosis of diabetes was based on prior diagnoses or the use of glucose‑lowering therapy rather than current laboratory testing, which may affect the accuracy of diabetes prevalence data.

Conclusions

In summary, this study provided the first detailed analysis of the distribution of lipid concentrations among the elderly and very elderly individuals in Poland, revealing significant sex- and age‑related differences in serum lipid profile. The marked reduction in the percentage of individuals with elevated serum TC levels with age suggests a strong association with mortality in that population, which underscores the critical role of this cardiovascular risk factor. Among individuals over 80 years of age, serum LDL‑C and TC concentrations are higher than the general population averages in Poland. Over 62% of seniors have a TC concentration exceeding 190 mg/dl or are receiving statin therapy, highlighting the high prevalence of hypercholesterolemia in this population. In contrast, hypertriglyceridemia is less common, affecting nearly 30% of Polish seniors. Although triglyceride levels decline with age, this trend is less pronounced compared with LDL‑C.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
Supplementary material.pdf
Download
Acknowledgements: None.
Funding: This analysis received no external funding. The primary study was implemented under the state‑funded project entitled, “Medical, psychological, sociological and economic aspects of aging in Poland”— PolSenior, No. PBZ‑MEIN‑9/2/2006; The Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland.
Contribution statement: TZ, TG, and KC conceived the concept of the study. KC, TG, PŚ, MM, JC, AW, and TZ contributed to the design of the research. KJ analyzed the data. All authors edited and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
References
  1. Smith SJ. Screening for high‑risk cardiovascular disease: a challenge for the guidelines: comment on “systematic review of guidelines on cardiovascular risk assessment: which recommendations should clinicians follow for a cardiovascular health check?” Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170: 40‑42. | Crossref
  2. Strzelecki Z, Szymborski J. Morbidity and mortality of cardiovascular diseases and the demographic situation of Poland. Government Population Council. 2015 [in Polish]. https://bip.stat.gov.pl/files/gfx/bip/pl/zamowieniapubliczne/426/248/1/81_gp_rrl_2015_monografia_kardiologiczna.pdf. Accessed May 13, 2024
  3. Townsend N, Wilson L, Bhatnagar P, et al. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update 2016. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37: 3232‑3245. | Crossref
  4. The Global Cardiovascular Risk Consortium. Global effect of modifiable risk factors on cardiovascular disease and mortality. N Engl J Med. 2023; 389: 1273‑1285. | Crossref
  5. Benfante R, Reed D. Coronary heart disease in the elderly? JAMA. 1990; 263: 393‑396. | Crossref