Ventricular fibrillation induced by radiofrequency energy delivery for premature ventricular contractions arising from the right ventricular outflow tract: is implantablecardioverterdefibrillator indicated?

INTRODUCTION    Inadvertently induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) by radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery for premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) is a rare phenomenon; nevertheless, it is crucial to assess long‑term risk of sudden cardiac death in these patients.
OBJECTIVES    The aim of our study was to define the long‑term prognosis in patients with normal ejection fraction (EF), in whom VF was inadvertently induced by RF energy application during ablation of symptomatic idiopathic PVCs originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT).
PATIENTS AND METHODS    Among over 20 000 RF catheter ablations performed at 5 tertiary centers (2008–2016), 6 patients (5 men) had VF induced by RF application to the RVOT. The mean (SD) age of patients was 35.2 (16.8) years. All patients had normal EF (≥60%). We analyzed the risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and assessed heart function during follow‑up.
RESULTS    After ablation, baseline contrast‑enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 4 of the 6 patients; no area of late gadolinium enhancement was observed. One patient received an implantable cardioverter‑defibrillator (ICD). Exercise tests revealed only rare PVCs. All patients completedthe follow‑up (mean [SD] duration of follow‑up, 64.0 [34.9] months). All patients were alive, with no cases of syncope, documented ventricular tachycardia, or VF. The patient with an ICD received 2 inappropriate high‑voltage therapies.
CONCLUSIONS    Patients with inadvertently induced VF via RF energy application during ablation of PVCs from the RVOT, who have normal left ventricular function and no electrocardiography abnormalities have good prognosis and low VF risk during long‑term follow‑up. Therefore, ICD placement seems to be not indicated for these patients.